Category talk:Interlanguage link template forcing interwiki links
Appearance
Are most pages in this category here "on purpose"?
[edit]@Primefac: An early version of this category's description said Most such instances should be removed from the article concerned (but be careful where there are multiple instances on one page).
I suspect most uses of |preserve=
and |display=
are intentional and should not be removed. In fact, I can't think of any case where someone would put one of these on a page and desire that it be removed.
Can you think of any? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- After asking the question above, I started going through the list. I found some cases where someone used the old Template:ill2 which a bot later turned into {{interlanguage link|....|display=1}}. In at least once case, at the time the ill2 link was placed, the English page did not exist. Now, the English page exists along with several translations, not just the two listed. I changed the link into an English-only link here. I'll go through the rest of the list as time permits. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:35, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- First pass at cleanup complete. The remaining uses are either:
- Redlinks or redirects
- Bluelinks where it wasn't immediately obvious that the en-wiki page was "AFD-proof" so I left the ILL in. This includes many pages created since 2016 and pages with a relatively low number of edits.
- Bluelinks where the en-wiki page was much less developed than the other-language page
- Bluelinks where the en-wiki page had a header recommending translation from the other-language page
- Anything dealing with COVID-19, as that is a "developing story" I didn't want to mess with.
- Pages with one or more of the above, where I just "stopped looking" once I realized I couldn't clear out all uses on that page.
- I removed the template from Template:Ethnic groups in Myanmar, 1561 celestial phenomenon over Nuremberg, and some but not all uses of List of writers on antisemitism.
- The rest of the uses should be either left alone or carefully looked at before removal. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)