Category talk:Image-Class articles
Appearance
Maybe we don't need to keep this category? There will be very few, if any, categories in it. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:33, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's probably not causing any harm (is it confusing any parserFunctions anywhere?), so it should be kept as a {{category redirect}} (absent any compelling reason to delete). –xenotalk 12:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Just tidying up ;) Any compelling reason to keep? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Historical reasons, to point folks to the new category, incoming links, etc. –xenotalk 13:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, fine with me. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Historical reasons, to point folks to the new category, incoming links, etc. –xenotalk 13:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Just tidying up ;) Any compelling reason to keep? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)