Category talk:G13 eligible AfC submissions

This category was nominated for merging on 20 May 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the G13 eligible AfC submissions category.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

If you like userboxes, you can monitor this category using: {{User:Technical 13/Userboxes/G13|user= (name)}}
Doing so will look something like below, only "This user" will be your username if in your userspace. :)

id1

This user is
evaluating CSD:G13
eligible AfC drafts

id2

Sort key?

Why are all these articles clustered under heading 1? --Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Mon 13:38, wikitime= 05:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

because they are sorted with the oldest first. It's a clever sorting that was set up, and I don't have time to explain the details of it at the moment. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 21:58, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant. So you can never find anything again?! Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Sat 16:44, wikitime= 08:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why bother?

What is the point of this category? Why not just put them straight in the bin after six months? If the original perpetrator has no interest in continuing, why should anyone else? -- Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Sat 16:45, wikitime= 08:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other people may. If you don't, you're free to list them for G13 and admins will delete them and then if there is an interest in re-creating them, we have WP:REFUND. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category not picking all pages up

I've found that many pages marked as duplicating an existing topic don't get pulled in aftsr 6 months. Legacypac (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]