Category talk:Cyclizines
Should this category be renamed to Category:Diphenylmethylpiperazines?
[edit]After I created this category, I realized that Wikipedia has a page on Diphenylmethylpiperazine. Originally, when I created the category, I named in Category:Cyclizines because the simplest chemical I could find in the group of articles I was making a category for was Cyclizine, I wanted the category to have a main article if possible, and all of the other pages had cyclizine as a substructure. Now that I know that Diphenylmethylpiperazine exists, I think that this category should be moved to Category:Diphenylmethylpiperazines so Diphenylmethylpiperazine can be added to the category and become its main article. The main arguments against the move would probably be that cyclizines form a class of drugs that does not include Diphenylmethylpiperazine and that the article for Cyclizine is much longer than the article for Diphenylmethylpiperazine, which would imply that Cyclizine is more significant than Diphenylmethylpiperazine and therefore that the fact that a compound is based off of Cyclizine is more important than the fact that it is based off of Diphenylmethylpiperazine. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 03:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)