Category talk:Critics of Scientology

This category was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This category was nominated for deletion on 21 April 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This category is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles

Biography

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Carlos Mencia

Carlos should be add as scientology critic.He often pokes fun at it because he thinks is retarded to believe that.

Deletion

Just what is the point of this page? Imagine a page with critics of Christianity, it would go on for pages. What function does this page have.Chrisp7 09:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree wholeheartedly. I think this is a flawed category. As a a construct, what is its contrast pole? L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology followers? Anyone who has never said a word about it? I think it's okay to have a Scientology category but "Critics of Scientology" as a category is card-stacking and has too much potential for creating abuses. Once tagged as a critic of Scientology, the Wikipedia entry could become a target, especially given the philosophy of "attack the attacker" as noted on the Scientology page. I have no dog in this fight. I have noticed a few instances of where pages get tagged with this category getting completely mauled.I just don't think Wikipedia should get involved in any campaign to target people. I second the nomination for deletion of this categoryScholarlyarticles (talk) 20:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]