Category talk:Catholic organizations by century of establishment

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles

Catholicism

Catholic organizations by century of establishment is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Organizations

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles

Speedy renaming discussion

Moved from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy

– – Fayenatic London 08:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Roman Catholic organizations by century of establishment to Category:Catholic organizations by century of establishment – C2D per Category:Catholic organizations, Category:Catholic Church and article Catholic Church. I realize there is still more to be renamed than the below but let's just give it a start. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Category:Roman Catholic congregations by century of establishment‎ to Category:Catholic congregations by century of establishment‎
- Category:Roman Catholic dioceses by century of establishment to Category:Catholic dioceses by century of establishment
- Category:Roman Catholic institutes by century of establishment to Category:Catholic institutes by century of establishment
- Category:Roman Catholic orders by century of establishment to Category:Catholic orders by century of establishment
- Category:Roman Catholic organizations established in the 16th century to Category:Catholic organizations established in the 16th century
- Category:Roman Catholic organizations established in the 17th century to Category:Catholic organizations established in the 17th century
- Category:Roman Catholic organizations established in the 18th century to Category:Catholic organizations established in the 18th century
- Category:Roman Catholic organizations established in the 19th century to Category:Catholic organizations established in the 19th century
- Category:Roman Catholic organizations established in the 20th century to Category:Catholic organizations established in the 20th century
- Category:Roman Catholic organizations established in the 21st century to Category:Catholic organizations established in the 21st century
  Oppose, because this creates ambiguity. The Oct 2016 CFD was flawed, because the nominator failed to even mention the previous discussions, and the closer made no mention of taking them into account. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  Top category nominated at CFD, see here. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - I closed that discussion as rename the top one for now, but hold others for a month pending proposed RfC, following inconclusive DRV. – Fayenatic London 21:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this page was rather technincal, but there is another relevant set of subcategories (religonal and other devisions) listed under this category that should equally be renamed: Category:History of the Catholic Church. Feel free to edit this request according to any technical standards. Chicbyaccident (talk) 13:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What's more, Category:Catholicism has a rather complicated tree of categories that could likely be extensive merged with the category tree of Category:Catholic Church. Some of the content of Category:Catholicism could be moved to Category:Independent Catholicism, Category:Old Catholicism, etc. When that is done, the need of a merge as previously mentioned would be even more evident. Chicbyaccident (talk) 13:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Chicbyaccident: Although some categories have been renamed after a fairly recent discussion, other editors still feel that the decision was misguided, so we are not rolling it out to all the hierarchy yet. BrownHairedGirl has said she will post a "Request for Comment" to seek a broader consensus. – Fayenatic London 13:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm sorry, I'm not really sure what that is supposed to mean. Does User:BrownHairedGirl have a veto in this? Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Chicbyaccident it just means that there is no clear broad consensus on this issue. So until consensus established through an RFC, there are no grounds for a sppedy renaming. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      - @BrownHairedGirl: have you started an RfC on this yet? If not, I think these should be processed tomorrow. – Fayenatic London 14:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.