Category talk:Bon

This category falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles

Religion

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles

Tibet

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles

Central Asia

Category:Bon is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles

Move to English name Category:Bon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename.--Mike Selinker (talk) 08:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bön → Category:Bon – Correct non-standard category name as per WP:UE, WP:COMMONNAME, WP:UCN, WP:DIACRITICS, WP:COMMONSENSE, and WP:DICK. I propose that Good Olfactory (talk · contribs) restore the correction of this category to the proper, most common English spelling. — Who R you? Talk 00:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support — All errors relating to this category were repaired when it was moved to the proper, most common English spelling. See discussions at Article title, Article Text "Bön" is not the English term used for this, and Moving on. Good Olfactory can clean it up again and double-check every subsequent revision made by the bots as a result of his incorrect and uninformed reversion. — Who R you? Talk 00:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I reverted your manual rename of the category because the main article is at Bön, and category names should match the article name. If anything would be considered inappropriate, it would be unilaterally renaming a category without proposing the rename using the usual process. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 01:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Proposals to move categories are made using WP:CFD, not using WP:RM. Was this intended to be proposed at Talk:Bön, the article of the same name? Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 01:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at WP:CFD to avoid forking. — Who R you? Talk 05:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close wrong process WP:RM is not for category renaming, WP:CFD is. Further, the CFD template is in the wrong place, it goes on the category page, not the talk page. And this is already being discussed at WP:CFDALL. Further CFD discussion take place on CFD pages, not talk pages. -- 70.24.248.23 (talk) 06:30, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.