Category talk:Articles using Cite rowlett template with invalid page designation

Contested deletion

This category should not be speedy deleted as being unpopulated, because it's a standard maintenance category for template errors. It should be empty most of the time. I just forgot to put the right header template on it. Sorry about that. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

I still plan on converting up to 900 square-link instances to the template, it could introduce errors. My earlier idea of bot level checking codes before adding into the article didn't work, that bug is fixed, but I still would like some tracking at least until this project is done (and really why not keep it around for future conversion work someone may do). --GreenC 19:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GreenC, you are welcome to remove the speedy deletion template. I am forbidden from doing so because I created the page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok done. -- GreenC 02:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]