Categorical trace
In category theory, a branch of mathematics, the categorical trace is a generalization of the trace of a matrix.
Definition
[edit]The trace is defined in the context of a symmetric monoidal category C, i.e., a category equipped with a suitable notion of a product . (The notation reflects that the product is, in many cases, a kind of a tensor product.) An object X in such a category C is called dualizable if there is another object playing the role of a dual object of X. In this situation, the trace of a morphism is defined as the composition of the following morphisms: where 1 is the monoidal unit and the extremal morphisms are the coevaluation and evaluation, which are part of the definition of dualizable objects.[1]
The same definition applies, to great effect, also when C is a symmetric monoidal ∞-category.
Examples
[edit]- If C is the category of vector spaces over a fixed field k, the dualizable objects are precisely the finite-dimensional vector spaces, and the trace in the sense above is the morphism
- which is the multiplication by the trace of the endomorphism f in the usual sense of linear algebra.
- If C is the ∞-category of chain complexes of modules (over a fixed commutative ring R), dualizable objects V in C are precisely the perfect complexes. The trace in this setting captures, for example, the Euler characteristic, which is the alternating sum of the ranks of its terms:
Further applications
[edit]Kondyrev & Prikhodko (2018) have used categorical trace methods to prove an algebro-geometric version of the Atiyah–Bott fixed point formula, an extension of the Lefschetz fixed point formula.
References
[edit]- ^ Ponto & Shulman (2014, Def. 2.2)
- ^ Ponto & Shulman (2014, Ex. 3.3)
Further reading
[edit]- Kondyrev, Grigory; Prikhodko, Artem (2018), "Categorical Proof of Holomorphic Atiyah–Bott Formula", J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 19 (5): 1–25, arXiv:1607.06345, doi:10.1017/S1474748018000543
- Ponto, Kate; Shulman, Michael (2014), "Traces in symmetric monoidal categories", Expositiones Mathematicae, 32 (3): 248–273, arXiv:1107.6032, Bibcode:2011arXiv1107.6032P, doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2013.12.003, S2CID 119129371