Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A.
Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A. | |
---|---|
Decided May 30, 2024 | |
Full case name | Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A. |
Citations | 602 U.S. ___ (more) |
Holding | |
The Second Circuit failed to analyze whether New York’s interest-on-escrow law was preempted as applied to national banks in a manner consistent with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. v. Nelson. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Kavanaugh, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. v. Nelson |
Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A., 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Second Circuit Court of Appeals failed to analyze whether New York’s interest-on-escrow law was preempted as applied to national banks in a manner consistent with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. v. Nelson.[1]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A., 602 U.S. ___ (2024) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)