Jump to content

California Senate Bill 242 (2009)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SB 242[1] is a bill which was proposed in the California Senate February 24, 2009, by Senator Leland Yee (D), as a modification of the Unruh Civil Rights Act in California.[2]

It was approved (vote 3–2) by Committee in March, 2009.[3]

It was approved (vote 21–15) by the Senate on April 16, 2009.[4]

It was amended July 14, 2009. The changes improve the clarity of the wording of the bill, but do not change the meaning of the bill.[5]

It was approved (vote of 48–27) by the Assembly on August 20, 2009.[6][7]

(As of 26 August 2009) SB 242 must receive a procedural concurrence vote in the Senate before heading to the Governor's desk.

This bill was vetoed by the Governor on October 11, 2009.[8]

Excerpts from the bill's text

[edit]

Legislative Counsel's Digest (from the amended version)[9]

The Unruh Civil Rights Act generally prohibits business establishments from discriminating on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, or medical condition.

This bill would make it a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act to adopt or enforce a policy that requires, limits, or prohibits the use of any language in or with a business establishment, unless the policy is justified by a business necessity, as defined, and notification has been provided of the circumstances and the time when the language restriction or requirement is to be observed and of the consequences for its violation.

The bill would define business necessity to require, among other things, that the language restriction or requirement is necessary for the safe and efficient operation of the business and that an equally effective, but less discriminatory, alternative practice does not exist.

Controversy

[edit]

It is of concern to many companies that this legislation will either open them to lawsuits,[10] or increase their cost of doing business[11] in California, as they could be subject to minimum damages of $4,000, if a business limits the use of a customer's language, even if unintentionally.[12]

See also

[edit]
[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Official California Legislative Information. "Documents associated with SB 242 in the Session". Archived from the original on 31 August 2009. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  2. ^ Senator Yee. "BILL NUMBER: SB 242 INTRODUCED". Archived from the original on 20 April 2009. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  3. ^ California Political Desk. "Language Discrimination Bill Approved by Committee". Archived from the original on 2009-04-05. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  4. ^ Unofficial ballot. "SB 242 Senate Vote Information". Archived from the original on 12 December 2012. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  5. ^ Senator Yee. "BILL NUMBER: SB 242 AMENDED". Archived from the original on 2009-12-23. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  6. ^ Unofficial ballot. "SB 242 Assembly Vote Information". Archived from the original on 2009-12-23. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  7. ^ INQUIRER.net. "CA Assembly OKs bill on language protection". Archived from the original on 2013-02-21. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  8. ^ Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. "Governor's Veto Statement". Retrieved 4 January 2009.
  9. ^ Senator Yee. "BILL NUMBER: SB 242 AMENDED". Archived from the original on 2009-12-23. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  10. ^ Grassroots Action Center. "SB 242 (Yee; D-San Francisco) New Lawsuits Against Small Business - JOB KILLER - OPPOSED". Archived from the original on 2013-01-18. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  11. ^ Dean Cascio. "They still want more tax money in Sacramento Ca". Archived from the original on 11 July 2011. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  12. ^ CalChamber. "2009 'Job Killer' Bills". Archived from the original on 2009-05-30. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
Stub icon

This legislation article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=California_Senate_Bill_242_(2009)&oldid=974040839"