Jump to content

Barnes Peacock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sir Barnes Peacock
Chief Justice of the
High Court at Calcutta
In office
1 July 1862 - 1870
Preceded byPosition Established
Succeeded bySir Richard Couch
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Judicature at Fort William
In office
1859 - 1862
Preceded bySir James Colvile
Succeeded byPosition Abolished
Personal details
Born(1805-01-07)7 January 1805
St Giles, London, England
Died3 December 1890(1890-12-03) (aged 85)
South Kensington, London, England
Resting placeHighgate Cemetery, London
Children12, including Walter Peacock
Occupationlawyer, judge

Sir Barnes Peacock (7 January 1805 – 3 December 1890) was an English barrister and judge who served as the first Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court in India and the final Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Judicature at Fort William. Alongside Lord McAulay, he is credited with authoring the Indian Penal Code. He is also noted for pointing out the flaw that invalidated Daniel O’Connell’s 1843 sentence.

Background and early career

[edit]

Barnes Peacock was born on 7 January 1805 in St Giles to Lewis and Elizabeth Peacock. His father worked as a solicitor and held the office of Messenger to the Great Seal. His grandfather, also called Lewis Peacock, had served as Mayor of Lowestoft.

In 1831, Peacock started practise as a special pleader until he was called to the bar in 1836 by the Inner Temple, and joined the Home Circuit. His speciality, owing to his training and physique, was in arguing refined points rather than imposing his will upon common juries.

In 1843, famed Irish political campaigner Daniel O’Connell held a major political rally Clontarf, Ireland in favour of Irish independence. At this rally, which the government had prohibited in order to prevent civil unrest, O’Connell was arrested and so he subsequently disbanded the rally. O’Connell was sentenced to a year’s imprisonment as well as being required to pay a fine of £2,000. In August 1844, he tried to appeal the case by way of writ of error to the House of Lords. Peacock, as well as other more senior counsel, were required to defend him in this appeal. Peacock, despite his junior standing, pointed out a flaw that, although technical, could not be refuted by those representing the case against O’Connell. This led the House to revert the original decision and O’Connell was released from custody.

Following this success, from which Peacock’s subsequent fame and distinction is thought to have arisen, he practised on the back benches until he took silk on 28 February 1850. He was elected a bencher of the Inner Temple that same year.

Peacock had a number of pupils, including George Jessel, George Denman, and George Cornewall Lewis.

British India

[edit]

In 1852, Peacock travelled to Calcutta, which was at that point the capital of British India, upon being appointed a Legal Member of the Supreme Council to the Governor-General of India. In this capacity he served under the Marquess of Dalhousie until 1856 and from then under Lord Canning. Under Lord Dalhousie, Peacock supported the annexation of Oudh in 1856 through the Doctrine of lapse. He similarly supported Canning throughout the Indian Mutiny. The Legislative Council was established soon after his arrival, although he was so frequent a speaker that legislation that made councillors deliver their speeches sitting was said to have been devised with the sole purpose of restraining him. As a legal member of the Council of India, Peacock was mostly concerned with codification of Common Law in India and the establishment of the Indian Penal Code. He left this role in April 1859.

The High Court at Calcutta in 1865; standing (from left to right): Arthur George McPhearson, Elphinstone Jackson, Frederick Augusta Bernard Grover, John Budd Phear, Charles Steer, Sumboo Nath Pundit, Francis Baring Kemp, George Campbell, and John Paxton Norman; sitting (from left to right): Charles Binny Trevor, Henry Vincent Bayley, Walter Scott Seton-Kari, Sir Barnes Peacock, Walter Morgan, and George Loch
The High Court at Calcutta, 1865; Peacock is the third seated from the right.

In 1859, Sir James Colvile stood down as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Judicature at Fort William. Peacock succeeded him in this role and was simultaneously made Vice-President of the Legislative Council of India, as well as receiving a knighthood. In 1862, the Indian judicial institutions were remodelled and Peacock’s position was replaced by the Chief Justice of the High Court at Calcutta, a role he assumed on 1 July.

Return from India, Privy Council, and death

[edit]

In 1870, Peacock returned to England from India for the last time with a “good and deserved” reputation. From 1872 until his death he was a paid member of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. In this role his work was marked with caution, rather than brashness. Amongst other cases he would deliver judgement on Hodge v The Queen, La Banque d'Hochelaga and another v. Murray and others,

Peacock passed away from heart failure on 3 December 1890, at the age of 85 in his home at 40 Cornwall Gardens in South Kensington. His Personal Estate at the time of his death was worth £23,325 (£3,756,216 when adjusted for inflation in 2024). He was buried in the terrace catacombs on the west side of Highgate Cemetery.

Personal life

[edit]

Peacock married Elizabeth Mary Fanning, the daughter of William Fanning, in 1834. The couple had eight children together. Elizabeth died aged 49 in 1865 and was buried in Monghyr, Bengal, India. Many of their children decided to follow him into the Indian civil service and legal system.

He secondly married Georgina Showers, the daughter of Major-General St. George Showers. They married at Calcutta in 1870 and remained so until his death. They had two children, Sir Walter Peacock, an advisor to the Prince of Wales, and Herbert St. George Peacock, a judge of the Sudan High Court.

References

[edit]
  •  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Peacock, Sir Barnes". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 21 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 20.
[edit]
Legal offices
Preceded by Supreme Court of Judicature at Fort William
1859–1862
Succeeded by
Position abolished
Preceded by
New position
Chief Justice of Bengal
1862–1870
Succeeded by