Akanksha Infertility Clinic
The Akanksha Infertility Clinic is a women's health centre located in Anand, Gujarat, India,[1] and headed by Dr Nayna Patel.[2][3] The clinic was founded in 1999, and was originally focused on In Vitro Fertilization. India declared commercial surrogacy legal in 2002; however the clinic did not begin to do surrogacy until 2004.[4] Patel, who appeared on Oprah Winfrey's talk show in 2007, has produced more than 1000 surrogate babies as of October 2015.
Patel states that "we provide a legitimate service to those in need, whether it is the couple who desperately want a child or the woman who wishes to change her circumstances, to educate her children, build a house or pay off debts."[5]
Surrogacy
[edit]Surrogacy involves the infertile couple going to the clinic, requesting a surrogate, and essentially renting her womb for the next nine months. The surrogate will be implanted with the sperm and egg, and hopefully after having a successful birth, will give up the child to its parents. The women are then paid. Dr. Patel pays her surrogates around 400,000 rupees ($6,500). Couples are charged an average of $25,000 to $30,000 per baby.
Of the women who work as surrogates "nearly half described themselves as housewives and the rest were a mix of domestic, service, and manual laborers".[4] Most of them are married and have children of their own. They must live at the clinic, are heavily monitored and restricted, and are not allowed sex for the duration of their pregnancy. Their young children are allowed to stay with them, as a way to prevent to the women from getting attached to the baby they are carrying. During their required stay "residents are offered daily English classes and weekly lessons in computer use" and the director "arranges film screenings and gives out school backpacks and pencil boxes to surrogates' children".[4]
In India, "surrogacy...is slated to add $2 billion to the nation's gross domestic product".[4] So the country gets money, the surrogates get the needed money, and a couple gets a baby.
For comparison, in the US, the cost is $150,000, in a handful of states where it is permitted. For surrogates, the compensation outweighs the downside. A recent surrogate was the wife of an auto-rickshaw driver with three daughters of her own. she had to live in a hostel for nine months with 60 other surrogates so the clinic could monitor her health.
Akanksha claims an implantation success rate of 44%, similar to other Indian clinics, compared with a US norm of 31%.[6]
Controversy
[edit]Regulations and rights
[edit]While surrogacy is legal, it is highly unregulated. They are attempting to make the surrogate mothers happy. However it does "little to improve the life for women" and takes away their rights to decide whether they want an abortion or not.[4] Another problem is that "lack of regulation could spark a price war for surrogacy".[4] This means that other countries could have surrogates willing to be paid a lower wage per baby carried. This leads to surrogate clinics basically competing against other clinics in other countries, creating a "race to the bottom." If this happens then the protections for surrogate mothers could decrease; "with countries slowly under-cutting fees and legal protections for surrogates along the way".[4]
There are other cultural consequences as well. Women who are surrogates face the risk and consequences of being rejected from society or being discriminated against. There is another issue, the "dilemma of all rural surrogates: being suspected of adultery—a cause for shunning or worse".[4]
A huge controversy related to money was observed as per this article India's Baby Factory | Journeyman Pictures
Citizenship
[edit]There was an issue of the citizenship of children, as many countries do not recognize surrogacy and these babies therefore have no legal standing [7]
Baby Manji controversy
[edit]A Japanese baby girl born to an Indian surrogate mother was in legal limbo after the couple who had intended to raise her divorced.[8] The three-month-old baby had been unable to leave India after her birth because she holds neither an Indian nor a Japanese nationality. The issue was resolved after the Japanese Government issued a one-year visa to her on humanitarian grounds, after the Indian Government had granted the baby a travel certificate in September in line with a Supreme Court direction.[9]
Legislation
[edit]Ban on surrogacy
[edit]In October 2015 a letter was sent by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). The letter bans foreign couples getting Indian surrogates.[10] This sparked public outcry and protests. People are concerned about the effect the ban will have on the economy of Anand.
The surrogacy industry has played a role in transforming the economy of Anand in India and financially bettering the lives of thousands of poor families and the government's recent move to ban the practice will wipe out incomes.[11] "About 5,000 families in Anand are surviving on surrogacy," says Dr Patel, whose clinic has been at the forefront of the country's commercial surrogacy sector. "There are the surrogates, the nannies, the rickshaw drivers, the hoteliers who employ hundreds of peoples, the restaurants, the shops. There are so many people directly or indirectly surviving on surrogacy, so it's going to be a huge economic impact as far as Anand is concerned.[11]"
Protections
[edit]In 2008 a law—the Assisted Reproductive Technologies Bill (ART)—was introduced to protect surrogates, the children and the commissioning parents.[12]
Dr Anup Gupta, the founder of Delhi IVF, a clinic that handles five to six cases a month said that "The legislation will facilitate surrogacy".[13]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Kari Points, [COMMERCIAL SURROGACY AND FERTILITY TOURISM IN INDIA The Case of Baby Manji https://web.duke.edu/kenanethics/CaseStudies/BabyManji.pdf Archived 2013-10-02 at the Wayback Machine], Case Studies in Ethics, The Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University
- ^ Nita Bhalla and Mansi Thapliyal Mon Sep 30, 2013, India seeks to regulate its booming 'rent-a-womb' industry [1] [2], Reuters
- ^ Release, ANI Press (October 17, 2022). "Dr Niket Patel of Akanksha IVF hospital and research institution awarded best IVF hospital by former Gujarat Deputy CM Nitin Patel". www.business-standard.com.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Hochschild, Arlie (September 19, 2009). "Childbirth at the Global Crossroads". Archived from the original on March 8, 2018.
- ^ "Akanksha". ivf-surrogate.com. Archived from the original on 2018-03-08. Retrieved 2018-03-08.
- ^ "Inside India's Rent-a-Womb Business | Mother Jones". 2016-04-13. Archived from the original on 2016-04-13. Retrieved 2023-07-19.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ Doshi, Vidhi (2016-01-03). "'We pray that this clinic stays open': India's surrogates fear hardship from embryo ban". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 2018-03-09. Retrieved 2018-03-08.
- ^ Hannah Gardner, [Surrogate baby in legal limbo http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/south-asia/surrogate-baby-in-legal-limbo#ixzz2gP5nCM00 Archived 2013-10-18 at the Wayback Machine], The National, August 6, 2008
- ^ "Baby Manji reaches Osaka". The Indian Express. 2008-11-04. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
- ^ "Surrogate mothers stage protest in Anand". The Times of India. October 31, 2015. Archived from the original on May 11, 2021.
- ^ a b "Indian surrogacy ban leads to pain and anguish for Gulf couples". The National. Archived from the original on 2018-03-08. Retrieved 2018-03-08.
- ^ "India seeks to regulate its booming 'rent-a-womb' industry". Reuters. 2013-09-30. Retrieved 2023-07-19.
- ^ "The Island". 2016-03-04. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2023-07-19.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
External links
[edit]Draft, Assisted Reproductive Technologies Bill, [3], MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI