AI nationalism
| Part of a series on |
| Nationalism |
|---|
AI nationalism is the idea that nations should develop and control their own artificial intelligence technologies to advance their own interests and ensure technological sovereignty. This concept is gaining traction globally, leading countries to implement new laws, form strategic alliances, and invest significantly in domestic AI capabilities.[1]
Global trends and national strategies
[edit]In 2018, British technology investor Ian Hogarth published an influential essay titled AI Nationalism. He argued that as AI gains more power and its economic and military significance expands, governments will take measures to bolster their own domestic AI industries,[2] and predicted that the advancement of machine learning systems would lead to what he termed "AI nationalism." He anticipated that this rise in AI would accelerate a global arms race, resulting in more closed economies, restrictions on foreign acquisitions, and limitations on the movement of talent. Hogarth predicted that AI policy would become a central focus of government agendas. He also criticized Britain’s approach to AI strategy, citing the sale of London-based DeepMind—one of the leading AI laboratories, acquired by Google for a relatively modest £400 million in 2014—as a significant misstep.[3]
AI nationalism is chiefly reflected in the escalating rhetoric of an artificial intelligence arms race, portraying AI development as a zero-sum game where the winner gains significant economic, political, and military advantages. This mindset, as highlighted in a 2017 Pentagon report, warns that sharing AI technology could erode technological supremacy and enhance rivals' capabilities. The winner-takes-all mentality of AI nationalism poses risks including unsafe AI development, increased geopolitical tension, and potential military aggression (such as cyberattacks or targeting AI professionals).[4]
Several countries, including Canada, France, and India, have formulated national strategies to advance their positions in AI.[5] In the United States, a leading player in the global AI arena, trade policies have been enacted to restrict China's access to critical microchips, reflecting a strategic effort to maintain a technological edge. The United States’ National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI) frames AI development as a critical aspect of a broader technology competition crucial for national success. It emphasizes the need to outpace China in AI to maintain strategic advantage, reflecting AI nationalism by linking geopolitical power directly to advancements in AI.[4]
France has seen notable governmental support for local AI startups, particularly those specializing in language technologies that cater to French and other non-English languages. In Saudi Arabia, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is investing billions in AI research and development. The country has actively collaborated with major technology firms such as Amazon, IBM, and Microsoft to establish itself as a prominent AI hub.[1]
Historical and cultural context
[edit]AI nationalism is seen as deeply connected to historical racism and imperialism. It is viewed not merely as a technological competition but as a contest over racial and civilizational superiority. Historically, technological achievements were often used to justify colonialism and racial hierarchies, with Western societies perceiving their advancements as evidence of superiority. In the context of AI, this historical context continues to shape views on intelligence and development. Some argue that AI nationalism reinforces the idea of fundamental civilizational divides, especially between the Western world and China. This perspective often frames China's progress in AI as a direct challenge to Western values, presenting the AI competition as a struggle over values. AI nationalism is said to draw from long-standing anti-Asian stereotypes, such as the "Yellow Peril," which portray Asian nations as threats to Western civilization. This viewpoint links Asian technological advances with dehumanization and artificiality, reflecting persistent anxieties about China's growing role in the global tech landscape.[4]
Implications
[edit]AI nationalism is seen as a component of a broader trend towards the fragmentation of the internet, where digital services are increasingly influenced by local regulations and national interests. This shift is creating a new technological landscape in which the impact of artificial intelligence on individuals' lives can vary significantly depending on their geographic location.[1]
J. Paul Goode argues that AI nationalism may exacerbate existing societal divisions by promoting the development of systems that embed cultural biases, thereby privileging certain groups while disadvantaging others.[6]
See also
[edit]Further reading
[edit]- Hogarth, Ian, AI Nationalism, 2018
- Aaronson, Susan. The Age of AI Nationalism and its Effects. April 22, 2024. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4803311.
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Satariano, Adam; Mozur, Paul (August 14, 2024). "The Global Race to Control A.I." The New York Times.
- ^ Henshall, Will (2024-02-16). "Why Europe's Efforts to Gain AI Autonomy Might Be Too Little Too Late". TIME. Retrieved 2024-09-14.
- ^ Titcomb, James (2023-08-19). "The computer chip the world's superpowers are scrambling to own". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 2024-09-14.
- ^ a b c Mackereth, Kerry (2021-07-19). "A New AI Lexicon: AI Nationalism". AI Now Institute. Retrieved 2024-09-14.
- ^ Spence, Sebastian (2019-04-10). "The birth of AI nationalism". New Statesman. Retrieved 2024-09-14.
- ^ Skey, Michael (September 2022). "Nationalism and Media". Nationalities Papers. 50 (5): 846. doi:10.1017/nps.2021.102. ISSN 0090-5992.