1964 United Kingdom general election in England
Appearance
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (September 2024) |
The 1964 United Kingdom general election was held on Thursday 15 October 1964 to elect 630 members of the House of Commons, of which 511 constituencies were in England.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 511 English seats in the House of Commons 256 seats needed for English majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In this election, although the incumbent Conservative government led by Prime Minister Alec Douglas-Home was ousted by the Labour Party led by Harold Wilson, the Conservatives narrowly won a majority of seats in England. In the post-war era, this remains the one of the two elections (the other being the 1950 election) where the party winning a majority in the House of Commons not winning a plurality of seats in England- rather, the party which lost the general election won a majority of seats in England.
Result Table
[edit]Party | Seats won | Net change in seats | Total votes (in millions) | Voteshare | Change in voteshare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | 262 | 53 | 10.11 | 44.1% | 5.9% |
Labour | 246 | 53 | 9.98 | 43.5% | 0.1% |
Liberal | 3 | 2.78 | 12.1% | 5.8% |
References
[edit]- Barberis, Peter (September 2007). "Introduction: The 1964 General Election—the 'Not Quite, But' and 'But Only Just' Election". Contemporary British History. 21 (3): 284–285.
- 1964: Labour scrapes through, BBC News, 5 April 2005
- Schaffer, B. B. (7 April 2008). "The British General Election, 1964: A Retrospect". Australian Journal of Politics & History. 11 (1): 7–22.
- Denver, David (1 September 2007). "The 1964 General Election: Explaining Voting Behaviour Then and Now". Contemporary British History. 21 (3): 295–307.