Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-01-24/Flagged Revisions

I hope this is the right place for comments. I think it'd be useful to include what supporters of FRs have as their arguments. You also might want to oldid to the discussion on Jimbo's page as it will be archived eventually, that way if someone reads this article in a few weeks they can still get to the discussion? Other than those 2 things I like it. §hep • ^Talk 00:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will do :-) — Jake Wartenberg 00:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Jake Wartenberg 01:11, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should also oldid the RfAr page. Majorly talk 15:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Jake Wartenberg 15:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why aren't the IDs diffs? Pinpointing exactly where and when Jimbo said what he said and the ArbCom case attempted would be more helpful IMO. -- Menti sock 09:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We want to show the subsequent discussion. But feel free to link to some diffs, too. — Jake Wartenberg 13:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it could be that I'm just being dense, but I went to WP:RFAR and WP:RFAR/C to read what Sceptre and the committee had discussed there, but I couldn't find the FR case. Could somebody provide a link in the article, por favor? Thanks. Killiondude (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last revision before it was archived.--ragesoss (talk) 01:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I appreciate that. Killiondude (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]