Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Waterways
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject UK Waterways and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
 | WikiProject UK Waterways was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 10 January 2011. |
| Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Coordinates + microformats
[edit]Archives
[edit]This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:48, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Commons:Talk:BSicon that may be of interest to members of this group. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 22:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
New canal reservoir data
[edit]The Environment Agency have made available a dataset extracted from their public register of Large Raised Reservoirs (including canal reservoirs). It includes official names, capacities, and completion dates. Here's an explanatory blog post and a useful map by Owen Boswarva.
I have cited it, for example, in this edit, thus:
<ref name="LRR">Environment Agency public register of Large Raised Reservoirs, as at 2 November 2020, via {{cite web |last1=Boswarva |first1=Owen |title=Large Raised Reservoirs |url=https://www.owenboswarva.com/blog/note-lrr1.htm |access-date=7 December 2020}}</ref>
I hope you can make use of it for your local/ favourite reservoirs. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
[edit]I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
This template has been nominated for deletion. Can someone please explain to the nominator that RDTs aren't just for railway lines? Useddenim (talk) 21:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Route diagram template
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Route diagram template#RfC: deprecation of BS-map , which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Mackensen (talk) 02:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Request for merge with WikiProject Rivers?
[edit]Could this WikiProject be merged with WikiProject Rivers? Darbymarby (talk) 14:51, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for River Don Navigation
[edit]River Don Navigation has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)