Wikipedia talk:MediaWiki/DeveloperMemo/November2009
 | This page is part of the Wikipedia:MediaWiki/DeveloperMemo. Topics should be grouped logically in sections and subsections. Where, at the end of the month, it's not clear yet on a particular issue whether a request or question has consensus for inclusion in the current memo, the relevant discussion may be transferred to the next month's discussion page. The Memo itself should be kept as brief and precise as possible - detailed explanation should be elsewhere (if necessary, on a subpage). |
RevisionDelete
[edit]I've added a recommendation to cover the "enable RevisionDelete" bug. There appear to be some related issues, eg [1] - we might discuss what, if anything, we want to ask/request re those. Rd232 talk 15:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- A simple list of 'things what we want' is not going to be of any use to the developers; that's what bugzilla is for. What is missing from bugzilla is 1) what the enwiki community feels should be prioritised, and 2) where the enwiki community has 'returned the serve' on configuration issues by demonstrating community consensus. Happy‑melon 15:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Bugzilla doesn't have any provision, that I'm aware of, for the sort of discussion this page is supposed to achieve. And this page can cover both 1 and 2 as long as the developers are notified of it monthly and actually read it. Also, despite the "memo" name, as WP:DevMemo notes, the memo will have a response section, and the aim is to have two-way communication. As much as anything, though, it's about organising our own thoughts. We don't even know, as a community, what we want, so how the hell do we expect developers to pay any attention? Bug discussions are fragmented and confusing and few participate. Rd232 talk 16:05, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Special:PrefixIndex
[edit]It's been suggested at Wikipedia talk:Special:PrefixIndex that the default pages displayed (the first in the index, lots of !!! pages) be amended, to not showing any by default. Any thoughts on that? Rd232 talk 10:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think I was the first to suggest this change, hoping that it might be a simple one. Currently we see by default the 200 articles which happen to sort first in ASCII order. That would be a useful feature for a tiny wiki (so let's make the listing a configuration option rather than removing it completely). For a project as large as English Wikipedia, Special:Prefixindex shows a less helpful sample of titles beginning with ! and ", often of the form !!!Profanity!!! or "Spurious Quotes". It may be better to list these titles only on request. Certes (talk) 23:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, and it should be a pretty simple switch to add. Rd232 talk 00:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think it would be best if this page were used for issues that affect the English Wikipedia in some specific way, rather than just every general MediaWiki bug that some enwiki user happens to stumble across. Mr.Z-man 19:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- It does affect specifically - look at the first couple of lines at Special:Prefixindex. Rd232 talk 20:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, but it also affects every other MediaWiki wiki in the exact same way. What I meant was that this should be for bugs that have some significant impact on enwiki that it doesn't on most other wikis, or is creating some significant problem on enwiki, rather than just summarizing every recently discovered bug. If a developer just wants a summary of every bug, there are other ways to get that. This should attempt to augment Bugzilla in a way specifically tailored for issues important to the English Wikipedia, not to replace Bugzilla as a place to report general MediaWiki bugs. Mr.Z-man 20:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- I've developed the front page, WP:DevMemo, a bit, to clarify the purpose of this. Indeed, there is no point in duplicating Bugzilla. Rd232 talk 00:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, but it also affects every other MediaWiki wiki in the exact same way. What I meant was that this should be for bugs that have some significant impact on enwiki that it doesn't on most other wikis, or is creating some significant problem on enwiki, rather than just summarizing every recently discovered bug. If a developer just wants a summary of every bug, there are other ways to get that. This should attempt to augment Bugzilla in a way specifically tailored for issues important to the English Wikipedia, not to replace Bugzilla as a place to report general MediaWiki bugs. Mr.Z-man 20:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- It does affect specifically - look at the first couple of lines at Special:Prefixindex. Rd232 talk 20:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
MediaWiki:Welcomecreation->Welcome_notice
[edit]Followup from discussion at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_53#MediaWiki:Welcomecreation_-.3E_Welcome_notice: bug 21318 was filed on 27 October 2009. It requests a switch to permit MediaWiki:Welcomecreation to be turned off, with new users being directed to their user talk page instead; and a new message, MediaWiki:Welcomecreation2 be created, which would be displayed on the user talk page of new users until they dismiss it (the user talk page remains redlinked). Rd232 talk 10:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
PovWatch
[edit]This has consensus, but seems to have fallen by the wayside. Perhaps it can be included? — Jake Wartenberg 05:59, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- The proposal was supported, so I've added it to the list. Rd232 talk 11:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
LiquidThreads
[edit]moved from the memo page - looks like this doesn't need to go in.
- How is LiquidThreads progressing?
- LiquidThreads is being tested live at Strategy Wiki, where it can be implemented on any discussion page there and has been in use on its Village Pump page for a couple of weeks now. The author is responding to feedback and bug reports at the LiquidThreads feedback page, which itself uses LiquidThreads. Equazcion (talk) 18:08, 9 Nov 2009 (UTC)
- So is there a vague schedule for reaching a deployable state? Rd232 talk 18:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- None has been announced as far as I'm aware. You could inquire at the feedback page I linked above, or Werdna's talk page on that wiki. He's been very responsive. My personal assessment is that the Strategy Wiki implementation is the first live test of any public scale, which puts it at an early Beta stage, and there is still much to be worked out. Equazcion (talk) 18:39, 9 Nov 2009 (UTC)
- So is there a vague schedule for reaching a deployable state? Rd232 talk 18:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- LiquidThreads is being tested live at Strategy Wiki, where it can be implemented on any discussion page there and has been in use on its Village Pump page for a couple of weeks now. The author is responding to feedback and bug reports at the LiquidThreads feedback page, which itself uses LiquidThreads. Equazcion (talk) 18:08, 9 Nov 2009 (UTC)