Wikipedia talk:List of bibliographies

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Resource Exchange

If you have access to this resource, or if you need to verify a citation from this reference, check out WikiProject Resource Exchange.Resource ExchangeWikipedia:WikiProject Resource ExchangeTemplate:WikiProject Resource ExchangeResource Exchange articles

Bibliographies

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles

External vs. internal bibliographies

I found this list, List of books about Oakland, California, which at first glance seemed overly broad and poorly linked. however, what exactly is the argument against such a list, if indeed there is one? the article creator makes some valid points. I see we have listed at this page only 1 WP bibliography, for fly fishing. I note that there is a long list of books that are routinely used as references for WP articles, which themselves do not have articles. I would argue that any work which is referred to multiple times here, is likely to be an often referred to book in the real world, and thus probably qualifies for an article. This is a meta question somewhat off the topic of the oakland list. If the oakland list is for the most part a good idea, then we really should have many, many more such lists, culled from the extensive bibliographies of our articles.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 22:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What I propose

I notice that List of bibliographies redirects here and that this list includes both wikipedia articles and professionally published bibliographies. I think that List of bibliographies should become a list of professionally published bibliographies, as I think they will satisfy WP:NOTESAL as a group. I think that a list of wikipedia articles that are bibliographies should be included as a set index in the mainspace, possibly at Index of bibliography articles. James500 (talk) 10:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Come and join The Wikipedia Library

The Wikipedia Library is an open research hub, a place for organizing our amazing community of research and reference experts to collaborate and help improve the encyclopedia.

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)

Get free access to research!

...Support Open Access...

We are working together towards 5 big goals:

Connect editors with their local library and freely accessible resources

Partner to provide free access to paywalled publications, databases, universities, and libraries

Build relationships among our community of editors, libraries, and librarians

Facilitate research for Wikipedians, helping editors to find and use sources

Promote broader open access in publishing and research

Sign up to receive announcements and news about resource donations and partnerships: Sign up
Come and create your profile, and see how we can leverage your talent, expertise, and dedication: Join in

Introduce yourself :-)

-Hope to see you there, Ocaasi^{t | c} 14:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]