Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Xenosaga (series)
Appearance
I feel that this article has shown some improvement over the past month, but it could still use some work. I would like to know what needs to be fixed, expanded, improved, deleted, edited, and so on. I am hoping that us editors can get this article featured in the not-so-distant future. Anything and everything would be appreciated. Deckiller 03:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'll try to give you a more complete reply later,
but the first thing I would do is to create seperate articles for the different games. You might want to move the article itself to Xenosaga (series).Right now the article is rather confusing, mainly because information on all the different games is presented together. The series article should provide the info that binds the storyline as a whole together. More later. Jacoplane 03:34, 14 January 2006 (UTC) I agree with separating. The games seem to have enough material to be in separate articles.- In the lead section, it says that Xenosaga is primarily a series of video games, but leaves the reader wondering what else Xenosaga is, since the brief mention of animation is so far removed and the manga is not mentioned there, yet appears in the article.
- I have a couple of other notes, but I think they'll be resolved (or altered) by splitting the article. --Pagrashtak 04:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- As for the split, do you guys feel that there should still be a section for each game in the main article? Any other tips/ideas on the seperation? Deckiller 12:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Yes, a brief summary of how the game fits into the series with a {{main}} link would be appropriate.--Pagrashtak 22:55, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- As for the split, do you guys feel that there should still be a section for each game in the main article? Any other tips/ideas on the seperation? Deckiller 12:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
As a minor observation, you may want to have a lead image.Morgan695 22:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)- All set. Deckiller 22:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Are there any more recommendations, etc.? Deckiller 19:44, 19 January 2006 (UTC)