The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Self-Nomination This article has improved rapidly over the past few months, thanks to the help of many people in the MILHIST project. It is a GA but recently failed a FAC, and has improved substantially since then. -Ed! (talk) 15:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Broadly a well-researched and well-written piece. Before taking this back to FAC, it might be best to introduce more independent sources as it currently relies too heavily on COI material. --ROGER DAVIEStalk21:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Roger here. You might need a few more third party sources before FAC. Otherwise, excellent article. Woody (talk) 21:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also agree with Roger, but will offer one other independent piece of advice: before going to FAC, see if you can create some articles to reduce the number of redlinks in the article. Otherwise, its looks good. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
