Wikipedia:WikiProject Maryland/Frederick task force
 | This task force is believed to be semi-active. Although activity is slower than it once was, anyone is welcome to participate in the project. Remove the
|Semi-active parameter from this template if activity resumes or if this tag was changed in error. If almost no activity occurs in this task force, consider replacing this tag with {{WikiProject status|Inactive}}. |
|
Maryland Portal
|
Baltimore Task Force
|
Frederick Task Force
|
Montgomery Task Force
|
WikiProject Maryland
|
|
Main page
|
Discussion
|
Members
|
News
|
To-do
|
Assessment
|
Requests
|
Introduction[edit]Welcome to WikiProject Maryland's Frederick task force! This is a place to collaborate on Frederick-related articles. Look below for specific tasks related to editing Baltimore articles. Tasks[edit]
Scope[edit]The scope of this work group will be all articles in the Category:Frederick County, Maryland and its subcategories. Members[edit]Feel free to add yourself to the bottom of the list if you plan on participating. The more, the merrier! You may also wish to add one of this project's userboxes to your userpage. Doing so will automatically add you to the category for task force participants.
Articles[edit]New articles related to Frederick[edit]Please feel free to list your new Frederick-related articles here (newer articles at the top, please). Any new articles that have an interesting or unusual fact in them should be suggested for the Did you know? box on the Main Wikipedia page. DYN has a 72 hr. time limit from the creation of the article. To be filled in Articles for Review[edit]
Articles to fix[edit]To be filled in Statistics[edit]
Quality scale[edit]Importance scale[edit]The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important". Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Assessment log[edit]
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
Index · Statistics · Log |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
