Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 November 16
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 15 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 17 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 16
[edit]05:23:25, 16 November 2017 review of submission by BhushanWikipedian
[edit]
Hello, there please help me to improve my article, EON IT Park, Kharadi that I submitted yesterday (15/11/17) but it gets a decline.
So, please help me so that I can improve and resubmit it.
Thank you!BhushanWikipedian (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- @BhushanWikipedian: Hello, Bhushan. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. The best sources of information as to why your submission was declined, and how it might be improved, will be the reviewers who already looked at it. You can find their names and Talk page links in the "decline boxes" near the top of your submission. But before posting here, I took a quick look at it and found that I too would have declined it, and for the same reason. An office park for which little more can be said other than that it exists is not likely to have an article on Wikipedia. And the fact that you chose to list the tenants of that park, along with links to their web pages, adds a substantial element of promotionalism to the submission. In all, if you can not demonstrate that the park has been the subject of in-depth discussion by reliable independent sources, it is unlikely that an article on the park will ever be published here on Wikipedia. I hope this response has been helpful. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:10, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
@NewYorkActuary:Thank you NewYorkActuary for your guidance.I try to improve my article so that it meets the criteria and please guide me further if any issue.Thank you! BhushanWikipedian (talk) 06:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
So dear manager, may I know how I can post an article successfully in Wikipedia? Because what I post always be refused with the reason that it has already existed. But I am sure it doesn't.
Holly1688 (talk) 08:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Holly1688: Hello, dear Holly. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Your submission consists of just a few sentences, none of them sourced and one of them written in the first person (i.e., "we"). To me, it simply looks like an attempt to convince people that they should use galvanized metal roofing for their homes. The reviewer who declined your submission suggested that you might try to use your material to improve the article on corrugated galvanised iron. Or you might prefer working on the metal roof article. Either way, improving an existing article offers an easier way to get your material on to the encyclopedia. However, regardless of which article you choose to work on, the material will need to be referenced to reliable sources (something that you didn't do in your submission). I hope this response has been helpful. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
10:16:51, 16 November 2017 review of submission by Arobittech
[edit]- Arobittech (talk · contribs)
Why my page is being rejected, I am submitting a page for the 1st time in wikipedia. Please allow me with step by step guide. Thanks
Arobittech (talk) 10:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Arobittech#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I have included some independent reviews from various blog sites on the record label, however it has been declined. I have checked other record label pages on wikipedia that all seem to be similar and don't know why a site not related to the topic would mention a record label.
Most of the blog reviews etc have all been for the later releases - so wasn't sure if the reviewer hadn't looked further down at the references for Tracks You Might Have Missed v1 for example.
Danzzig (talk) 10:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Danzzig: Hello, Danzzig. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. The best sources of information as to why your submission was declined will be the reviewers who looked at it. You can find their names and Talk page links in the "decline boxes" near the top of the submission. But I took a look at it myself and found that I too would have declined it, and for the same reason. Virtually all of your references merely serve to confirm the existence of albums released on your label. Furthermore, most of those sources carry no weight when assessing the subject's notability, because they are either cites to your company's website or to iTunes and Spotify. And I find myself in respectful disagreement with the reviewer who opined that the AllPunkedUp cite was helpful. A review of an album is not at all the same as an in-depth discussion of the label. Adding to that the fact that the "History" section contains no sourcing whatsoever, it becomes easy to agree with the reviewers that you haven't demonstrated notability. I'll add that you might also have done yourself a disservice by presenting the reviewers with a lengthy listing of red-linked names of albums and albums. To me, it simply suggests that your label has not really produced enough notable work to establish that the label itself is notable. I expect that you will disagree with that assessment, but that is the impression created by all of those red-linked names.
As for articles on other labels, there are more than 5 million user-generated articles here on Wikipedia and it is inevitable that some will exist even though they should not. If you're looking for examples of well-written articles on labels, take a look at some our better-quality articles such as Mr. Lady Records and Key Sounds Label.
I hope this response has been helpful. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
11:29:56, 16 November 2017 review of submission by Jayantarana
[edit]- Jayantarana (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Hi,
Please let me know why the content GameMine platform have been removed? I have added relevant links that I got from the internet. It will be great if you can guide me how to approve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayantarana (talk • contribs) 11:29, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jayantarana. I do not understand your question. Draft:GameMine Platform was declined because it is promotional. No content was removed. Account Akash2017 is the only one that has contributed to that draft. Are you saying that you have also edited using that account? --Worldbruce (talk) 06:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
16:53:40, 16 November 2017 review of submission by G Kalpana
[edit]
G Kalpana (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Please give me suggestions to improve my article and tell me the reasons for rejection, so that i can rectify it
- Hi G Kalpana. The only sources Draft:Aju Karthick cites are videos on YouTube. I assume these are works by Karthick. If so, they are primary sources and not independent of him. To demonstrate that he is notable (that he satisfies Wikipedia's inclusion criteria), the draft would have to show significant coverage of him in multiple, indpendent, reliable, secondary sources (think books, newspapers, and magazines). --Worldbruce (talk) 06:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
21:30:03, 16 November 2017 review of submission by Forpr ep
[edit]Hi! I was informed that my submission for Robert Taft (Chemist and author) was denied because it "appears to be taken" from the text oat the following URL: http://www.kshs.org/archives/40172
While I did use that page as a cited reference, I did not plagiarize that page and didn't copy or paste any text without proper attribution.
So I'm not really sure why the submission was declined. I am quite sure the article could be improved, but as the text was not actually copied wholesale, but rather original writing based on multiple sources, I don't think the rejection is warranted or fair.
Forpr ep (talk) 21:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Forpr ep: Hello, Forpr. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Our apologies for the great delay in response. I've taken a look at your submission and I agree that you did not do a copy/paste job of the material. But I can see why the reviewer was concerned -- large portions of your submission are closely paraphrased from the KSHS site, using sentences that are essentially in the same order as the ones in the KSHS site with only minimal changes in wording. I suggest you open up a discussion with the reviewer to find out how much more re-writing will be needed to satisfy their concerns. You'll find the name of that reviewer, as well as a link to their Talk page, in the "decline box" near the top of your submission. I hope this response has been helpful. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
22:54:05, 16 November 2017 review of submission by Newzealandspaceagency
[edit]- Newzealandspaceagency (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Newzealandspaceagency (talk) 22:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Newzealandspaceagency. If you are wondering why Draft:New Zealand Space Agency Limited was declined, it was declined because it cites no sources. To demonstrate that the company is notable (is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia), the draft should cite multiple, indpendent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of the company. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)