Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 November 19
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 18 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 20 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 25
[edit]== Request on 12:02, 25 November 2015 for assistance on submission by TeamWiredEMBA for article titled Hispanic Marketing. I am inquiring regarding the exact reasons the submission has been declined and the steps that I need to take to get it published. Your guidance is appreciated. Thank you.
November 19
[edit]
Raminda 6 (talk) 08:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Raminda 6: Hello, and welcome to the Help Desk. Do you have a specific question about a draft? Thanks, /wia /tlk 14:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Request on 08:22:39, 19 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Rizwan ashraf khaksar
[edit]
Hi,
its just an article and i think have enough references to be published on Wikipedia. I guess, nobility of the references is not required for the general articles, is that?
Rizwan Ashraf 08:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC) Rizwan Ashraf 08:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have left a comment on your draft. It tells you that it is not suitable for Wikipedia and explains why.
- With regard to references, no, the standard is never reduced. Excellence of referencing is always required. Fiddle Faddle 11:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
10:38:34, 19 November 2015 review of submission by Pracbrown
[edit]
My article has been reviewed, but rejected on the basis of reading more like an advertisement. I have tried to make it as generic as possible, but did want to highlight the original product - perhaps similar to the 'cola' article that mentions Coke. Should I take out all reference to 'Elveden' in the Instant Hedging article, where it is mentioned twice.
Many thanks for your assistance, from a first time contributor!
- @Pracbrown: Hello, thanks for dropping by! I agree that there is a promotional tone to the piece. In particular, I think the paragraph about Elveden's instant hedge should probably be excised. If the article is about instant hedges in general, then this section seems out of place, as it is devoted to only one instant hedge "brand", promoting them through words like "unusual", references to "demand increas[ing]", and repeated use of the brand's name.
- I'd also consider getting rid of the "Why an Instant Hedge" section. This kind of pros-and-cons list looks good on a company website, but it doesn't quite mesh with Wikipedia's encyclopedic point of view requirements, and I'm not sure whether it adds much value to the article, especially given its lack of sources. There's also a referencing issue in the "importance of hedgerows" section, as there are some claims made here that aren't backed up by sources, like the suggestion that instant hedges can help reduce the greenhouse effect. While this is likely true on a trivial level, I'm not sure it's worth mentioning, and either way it will need some sort of citation to back it up.
- Work on tightening up the draft, or consider discussing on the Hedge talk page whether portions of this content might be better suited for inclusion in the Hedge article. Other reviewers may want to chime in with their suggestions too. /wia /tlk 14:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Full water (talk · contribs)
Full water (talk) 11:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
@Full water: Hello, and welcome to the Help Desk. Can we help you with a specific question about a draft? Thanks, /wia /tlk 14:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- The draft was speedy-deleted as unambiguous promotion and as copyright violation. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm trying to get a page accepted for Riot Jazz Brass Band. I have submitted twice and been turned down by the reviewer SwisterTwister. As far as I can see, I am meeting the notability requirements and I have included lots of references but apparently I'm still falling short. Could anyone give me any specific feedback about my page? Am I close to being accepted? It's my first page so would really appreciate any help that anyone can give me!
Zhaobide (talk) 13:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
15:58:21, 19 November 2015 review of submission by Taani hai
[edit]
Taani hai (talk) 15:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
y r u not acceptinh my articles..???
- We are ordinary folk who, generally, do not respond well to SMS-Speak. I have left you a comment on your draft which you should read and digest. Fiddle Faddle 01:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
19:54:22, 19 November 2015 review of submission by Mikecasey52
[edit]- Mikecasey52 (talk · contribs)
I have created a simple, factual page. It is short and correct. Why have you rejectedit
Mikecasey52 (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have added to the comment left by the prior reviewer, left on the draft. You have work to do. Please get to it with a will. Fiddle Faddle 01:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I have been trying to post a page for a business, but all of the articles I have posted have been questioned for notability. The business has been up for 4 years, and is a certified business. I would like to know what else I would need to do to be published on Wikipedia, as I have sent many articles to be reviewed.
Thank You, Nicolas DeCubas
Ndecubas (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have left you a message as a comment on the draft. There is a lot of work to do, and you may not be successful. The comment explains it better. Fiddle Faddle 01:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
21:18:31, 19 November 2015 review of submission by Miamicd11
[edit]
Miamicd11 (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Miamicd11: Hi, the article has been accepted into the mainspace and can be viewed by anyone from the public. There's no requirement for an article to be in a certain class in order for it to be seen. If you search "West End (Florida) in the Wikipedia search bar, the article should appear.
- As for search engines, Wikipedia doesn't control where its articles appear in search engine rankings. That's done by algorithms run by the search engine companies themselves. However, if you search "west end (florida) inurl:wikipedia" on Google, you will see the article appear, so it is certainly out there. Thanks! /wia /tlk 21:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)