Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 March 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 30

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This template is irrelevant and only causes clutter (especially for guys like Eric Dickerson and Deion Sanders. There is no related article and it's really small. RoyalsLife 18:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 06:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on one user talk page; not genericizable, interactiveness seems to be broken

agree, this template should probably be replaced with the likes of {{Global Heat Maps by Year}} --Yurik (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 06:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, seems too specific for any use I can think of, interactive functionality appears to be broken {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

agree, same as previous, should be replaced (redirect?) to {{Global Heat Maps by Year}}. --Yurik (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transcluded in one article and could be in one other, and each already links to and from one another. Doesn't further aid navigation. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 18:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 14:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:41, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TOOSOON, almost red links Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 22:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:58, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 14:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep per Hhhhhkohhhhh who says better to create in late April or early May which is in a couple weeks. pointless to delete now, just to recreate it in two weeks. if you don't like all the redlinks, then comment them out until the articles are written. Frietjes (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 06:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the main article at AfD, now there's just one blue link on this template, nothing else to link to, so I'm bringing it here. —SpacemanSpiff 11:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).