Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 February 12
February 12
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 25. Primefac (talk) 01:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
unused sandbox/fork of template:weather box. should be moved to userspace or deleted. Frietjes (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Userfy or delete —PC-XT+ 23:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 25. Primefac (talk) 01:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Aboutfile (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as we use different templates here than those on Wookiepedia —PC-XT+ 22:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
coloured links are bad for WP:ACCESSIBILITY, no need to have a template to do something that we don't generally want to do. Frietjes (talk) 23:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom —PC-XT+ 00:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).