Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 September 13

< September 12	September 14 >

September 13

Template:DPR K-League seasons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 20:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)}}[reply]

Not being used in any articles, and there are only two blue links anyway, so this "nav" template doesn't really navigate anywhere. Suggest deletion, until such time when/if this template becomes necessary. — PC78 19:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused and red farm links. Carlosguitar 14:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. One of the blue links was just deleted at AfD. — TKD::Talk 12:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Malta Euro 2008 Qualifiers Squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template regarding a "qualifier's squad" for a minor national team. As we deleted much more important templates in the past [1] and a consensus against proliferation of such templates was previously established, I think this should be deleted. — Angelo 16:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Angelo 16:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per previous consensus. WATP ^(talk) • _(contribs) 17:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per established consensus. Number 5 7 18:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP - DO NOT DELETE Since the Malta national football team is regarded as a minor squad, does not mean that its template should be deleted for this reason. Being a minor squad does not have so much opportunity to compete in major competition, so since national football teams templates consist of World Cups and EURO Cup, Malta will find it very hard to compete so no template for Malta.
So I decided to make a qualifiers squad, consisting of the current squad. If this should have to be deleted it should not have to de deleted at the moment since, the qualifiers are still going on. After the qualifiers, I find no objection for the template to be deleted.
JEPAAB 21:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Where are the EURO Cup templates you've mentioned? I think most, if not all, of them have been deleted via previous TFDs. - Neier 01:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per prior concensus. This has nothing to do with whether Malta is a 'minor' national team, but is based on the decision to eliminate templates for all continental championship teams such as Asian Cup, Gold Cup, Euro Cup, etc. Jogurney 22:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this is so far from being legitimate. Punkmorten 20:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not a World Cup team template, per concensus. This is not even a set squad, as players can change between qualifier matches, so, it is even less useful than most of the previously deleted templates. Neier 01:56, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Editors band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 20:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

procedural nomination Was tagged for PROD deletion by User:Featherfin with the reasoning "Template is defunct, please see Template:Editors (Band)". The nominated template appears incomplete and has no transclusion uses. — User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obsolete to {{Editors (Band)}} and unused. Neil916 (Talk) 06:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agreed, this template is obsolete. Carlosguitar 18:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SK nuke plant map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by MZMcBride. — Gavia immer (talk) 14:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, and appears to have been replaced with {{South Korea nuke plant map2}}, created by the same user. — PC78 09:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - I'm the creator, it was useful at the time, but it's been superceeded by the other one and deleting it is just a matter of housekeeping. -Theanphibian ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:US-KoreaMedals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 20:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A somewhat unnecessary single purpose template; only had one transclusion in another template, but I went ahead and subst'ed it. — PC78 09:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused, orphaned, seems to be unnecessary. Carlosguitar 18:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Baseball Cube

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 20:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated template, now orphaned, replaced by {{baseballstats}}. — Caknuck 06:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Carlosguitar 18:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Minority Leaders of the Erie County Legislature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 20:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rather useless template, I just speedied half the articles here as they didn't give much info, and local politicans fails WP:BIO, several others were prodded, and the people who are notable, it's because of other reasons, not this, Delete Jaranda ^{wat's sup} ^Sports! 02:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unneccesary. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 03:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Adam Sandler films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Films have many actors, so this is pretty much useless. It creates clutter in articles. Like we've been deleting all the other actor templates. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 00:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's a difference between listing these films on say, Rob Schneider (who is in most of these movies but not the star) and listing the ones that were Sandler vehicles. Certainly some could be removed, but these templates provide helpful, standardized navigation, and removal of them is a mistake. (Please point me to the discussion where it was decided to star removing them so I can see this reasoning for myself? Thanks.) --Thespian 09:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the mass deletion of other actor templates (April 11, August 5, August 6, and no doubt others). PC78 11:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.