Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archives/June 2009
Fulfilled requests
[edit]Why deleted ? I was looking for cloud computing providers, a major new technology, and suggested to a friend that the list was missing Nivio (which is promoted by the World Economic Forum) .. no sooner is the article up than someone has already deleted it. For goodness sake why ? Blackblade1 (talk) 13:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Done Undeleted - is sourceable and appears notable, needs a rewrite though. –xenotalk 13:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
undelete or userfied - speedy deleted before i could edit goals section later; was already reviewed by another admin as such. thanks Petersam (talk) 06:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Not done it was built from a copyright violation, please re-write entirely.
- Please userfied as only the goals section was taken from website goals and was quoteblocked and could be rewritten. I also had some references and ext links which i don't remember. thanks for userfied. Petersam (talk) 14:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Done Content minus the copyvio copied to your talk page. –xenotalk 14:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Please userfied as only the goals section was taken from website goals and was quoteblocked and could be rewritten. I also had some references and ext links which i don't remember. thanks for userfied. Petersam (talk) 14:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Article was userified for cleanup, but the talk page wasn't; article is now cleaned up and back in mainspace, so the talk page can be undeleted as well now ThaddeusB (talk) 04:41, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Denied requests
[edit]|page= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Clooney#Operation_CLOONEY.2C_GEORGE_CLOONEY
|reason= Operation CLOONEY, GEORGE CLOONEY is being requested by thousands of Students withing VIC,AUS that Operation CLOONEY, GEORGE CLOONEY
returns if not were it was but else where within the page at least for a day till after the 11th of june i speak for many student undertaking there GAT thank you please help us out here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SSGT.Ninja1 (talk • contribs) 08:09, 10 June 2009
- THANK YOU ANYWAY wiki for looking at it —Preceding unsigned comment added by SSGT.Ninja1 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 10 June 2009
Declined. The page you created at Empty page, while very funny, is not at all encyclopedic. There are plenty of free web hosts out there which would be a much better place for it. (And may I also suggest studying up a bit on the correct use of apostrophes? It might help on your test.)--Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
