Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 91

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 85←Archive 89Archive 90Archive 91Archive 92Archive 93→Archive 95

Alison Valerie Hart

reasoning -67.78.157.2 (talk) 03:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

The article is about Alison Valerie Hart, who has independently published her own book of over 500 pages, and has also published a unique presentation of filmography by combining cartoons and silent movies for a presentation representative of a new art form. She is an authority on silent movies stars and silent movie productions.

UniLemur

I want ou to keep this page so me and my friend can get recognition for our work. Please. -CookieRaider121 (talk) 20:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Fenno Heath

incorrectly deleted -Ssheath (talk) 21:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Jonny Z

reasoning -68.6.226.217 (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC) Jonny Z is a west coast Hispanic mc,who has 5 of the greatest Miami Bass songs of all time to his credit. His songs were a combination of danceable beats, mixed with more risque bilingual lyrics than those of most Latin MC'S of his time. He had 4 singles reach the Billboard Dance/ Maxi Single sales charts with Shake Shake, No Senor, Latin Swing and Mamacita.[1]

Jonny Z. grew up in San Diego Ca. He began performing in the early '90s and scored his first hit in 1993 with "Shake-Shake," which was released by Quality Records and reached the Top 40 of Billboard's dance chart. The song was not easily accepted at radio due to his use of the word "CULO". The song was such underground hit that it garnered radio and club play around the world It is considered to be one of the top 50 greatest Miami Bass songs of all time. [[2]] Jonny Z repeated this success with his 1996 self-titled debut album, "JONNY Z" which included three other Billboard dance chart hits, "No Señor," "Mamacita," and "Latin Swing." Two years later, his follow-up, Z 1 N Only, appeared; he then switched to the One Lil Vato imprint for his third album, 1999's Sancho Villa. On this album he was the first artist to combine regional Mexican music with rap, with the release of the single "THE CHONA" The following year, Jonny Z. moved to Thump Records and released his fourth full-length, Bass Balla, which featured contributions from Tequila Mission, the South Park Mexican, and ODM from a Lighter Shade of Brown. The album featured the song Ku-Ku which sampled Sonora Dinomita's classic. Jonny Z continues to perform to this day.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Cla68 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. What the article needs, if it is to be kept, is references to reliable sources, to verify what it says and to show how he meets the WP:Notability standard of WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 16:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

CTM Over bridge (2 tier)

reasoning -Vimleshchandra (talk) 05:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done The content of the article was: kjhkj jgkjg kjhkj...If you want to write an article, have a look at our guide for doing so. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 09:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

SN_Systems

SN Systems are the developers of the ProDG suite of software, used by console developers worldwide, both currently and for the last 20 or so years. They are not "Yet another games company". -SnClee (talk) 13:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The problems which led to deletion in teh first are still there, though, and I would advise to add reliabls sources asap. Lectonar (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Ashen Empires

The Game has been active since 2002 -Dgesler (talk) 14:43, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Ironholds (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. If the article is to be kept, it needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Dransik

The game has been running since 1996 and is still out there, can I have the page restored to fix anything needed to maintain it's creditability -76.2.222.177 (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done - I have restored this as a redirect to Ashen Empires (which has just been restored, see above). It was set up like that with edit summary "Dransik's name changed to Ashen Empires". JohnCD (talk) 15:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Steve Christie (ice hockey)

Contested PROD -Dolovis (talk) 18:14, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Lectonar (talk) 11:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Rajesh Kotecha

It is a simple biography -Lakshmianoop (talk) 05:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Lectonar (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

modcom

no advertise, just public service -Chen johny (talk) 10:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Die Hard Swiftie

Some guy deleted my page. Weirdo -WikiSwiftie (talk) 11:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

David Broll

Please restore the edit history for this re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Martin Frk

Please restore edit history for this recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 23:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

The Lab (electronic music duo)

I want to make a review to match wikipedia rules. Thanks. -Klinklan (talk) 11:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Klinklan/The Lab (electronic music duo). You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact John (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 13:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Success Academy Charter Schools

Please userfy the talk page (the AfD-deleted article without the talk page has already been userfied to another editor, who has started a new talk page), because the AfD process indicated that questions may arise about my editing and behavior (I was the most frequent editor) and in responding to that people will need access to the talk page and its history. I can reconstruct most of the talk page from offline files at home but other people don't have access to those. I intend to apply the NOINDEX search engine restriction to it, I don't intend to edit or add new topics/sections to the talk page, and I intend to indicate that it is not the current talk page for discussing the article or the talk (there is one already). If the talk page is not renamed during userfication, I intend to rename it to append something like "(former talk)", for clarity. These steps may take me a few days, as I expect to be offline for the holiday weekend. No BLP issue or copyright violation was said to apply to either the article or the talk page; the article was probably deleted as an alternative to stubification because of various reasons including length and promotionality (we disagreed). This is not a deletion review request. Nick Levinson (talk) 17:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC) -Nick Levinson (talk) 17:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Please include the subpage/s with their history/ies. I think there was only one archive page. Thanks. Nick Levinson (talk) 17:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Since the talk page is in my userspace then I have no problems having it deleted and replaced with the original.--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 Done Moved to Canoe1967's user space. J04n(talk page) 22:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
It turns out the archive hadn't been deleted and wasn't moved but I addressed the move elsewhere and the placement is apparently resolved. Thanks. Nick Levinson (talk) 17:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Ayaz Latif Palijo

I was still working on the article, the administrator without looking up the history of my everyday editing, gave up the notion to check and contact me whether if the 'citation' for the concerned sections were purposefully missing or was I still working on to modify them? I will provide citation and reliable sources, which of-course I was going to do so -Indusengineer 22:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done The page is not deleted yet...Lectonar (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Christian Billboard (June 1, 2013)

Please, I am working on getting the references and saw it was deleted, I know it meets your speedy nomination requirements, but once I'm finished, it WILL be a good page. -Candygarret (talk) 01:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. This could perhaps be userfied for you to work on, but please explain what you are trying to do here, because I do not see how this is going to be an acceptable article. If you are planning to copy into Wikipedia the ratings from some existing Christian billboard site, that is likely to be a copyright violation; on the other hand, if you plan to set up here a new billboard rating list of your own, I find it hard to see how that would not be WP:Original research. JohnCD (talk) 12:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

It is to inform people about my opinion of the chart, what I think the rankings should be, if it is not acceptable for a public page, then could you possibly make it visible just to me then? -Candygarret (talk) 09:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

That rationale seems to run afoul of couple of sections of WP:NOT, specifically, Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought and Wikipedia is not a blog, Web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site. There are a lot of places where you can get free web hosting. --Mosmof (talk) 14:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

So it would be unacceptable also if I use the actual ratings and put references to the site? Candygarret (talk) 11:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

But why would we only list one date? We have an article about the Billboard Christian charts - how you or anyone else personally feels about the chart on a specific date is irrelevant in an encyclopedia (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Thnks for your help, I'm sorry, I didn't realize there was a page for the christian billboard chart, sorry for the hassle, thanks again, Candygarret (talk) 18:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

I want to re-emphasize that if your purpose "is to inform people about my opinion of the chart, what I think the rankings should be" then Wikipedia is not the place to do it. Wikipedia is not your webhost, and we will not allow you to use us as a place to blog about your opinions on the charts or anything else, anywhere on the project. That's just not what we're for. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I know now, take care Candygarret (talk) 03:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

List of RADIUS servers

(1) Article is indirectly linked in a topic WLAN-Security-Problem from today (to be found in one of the biggest german IT magazines: [3]; it has a link to [4]; and that has a link to here). (2) Article is directly internally linked (from another WP-article). (3) Where is the deletion discussion??? (4) Who does decide what "notable" and what "unnotable" software should be??? -ProloSozz (talk) 10:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Do note, though, that incoming links do not make a topic notable, and that discussion is not always required for articles to be deleted. The guideline on what is and is not notable can be found here. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Tarczyn (company)

For more or less the same arguments I successfully argued for keeping Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortuna (company). It's a relatively known company in Poland. At the very least this should've went to AfD. I'd have deprodded it have I seen it, but I guess the editor who prodded it (pinging User:JamesBWatson?) didn't add WikiProject Poland template to the talk. -Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Youflik

reasoning -ishan (talk) 14:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)it is information of an www.youflik.com website which was created by an student in mangalore.

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning websites will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Jordan Serlin

Article was not written by me but was accurate and verified -Jordanserlin (talk) 16:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Serlin, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 16:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

webbys.in

reasoning -Webbysin (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC) Webbys.in is an Indian social networking service providing website for SME's, based in Kolkata, India which concentrates on startups and SME's. It was founded in May, 2013. The Webbys Network on its India launch acquired ThePHPJobs.com which provides job posting facility to Indian Employers.

Webbys Network, has launched the website webbys.in in its first phase in May, 2013 with the features of Social networking for Employees and have termed them Webbys on the site. And their other site Thephpjobs.com serves for employers to post jobs. It works for SME's and let Employers & Employee get networked.

In their June Launch Edition, they are covering Employers from different startups and sme's from Kolkata.

Greg Tingle

reasoning -Greg Tingle (talk) 03:53, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

I, Greg Tingle, request that my page not be deleated. I have been working in the Australian media, journalism and entertainment industry for over 10 years. I am a well known and respected journalist and media agent. I included many resources in the Wikipedia profile. Also note that some of my articles that appeared in the press (newspapers) over the years are not live on the newspaper websites anymore, as they update the pages. Thank you.

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Tingle, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mailer diablo (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 05:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Submissions/Upcoming Horror Movies.com

I, Frightie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore it or userfy it as appropriate. Frightie (talk) 19:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done, as we promise that G13 deletions will be restored on request; but AfC is not a place to store rejected material indefinitely, and you have not touched this for over four years. Please improve it and resubmit it soon, say within a month, or it will be deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Outlook Express XP Icon.png

This image was incorrectly removed from the article Outlook Express and subsequently deleted as an orphaned fair use image. -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Microsoft Internet Mail and News screenshot.png

This image was incorrectly removed from the article Microsoft Internet Mail and News and subsequently deleted as an orphaned fair use image. -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 20:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Windows Mail logo.png

This image was deleted per WP:F4 but should have been kept as a fair use image. -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

  • This image was deleted for not having a valid source. This makes it impossible to use on Wikipedia as we cannot properly attribute the image. Are you able to supply this information? The deleted revision I saw also lacked a FUR. Can you provide justification of why we need to use this non-free image? Its also not correctly licensed. Can you provide an accurate license for this image? Spartaz Humbug! 18:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Harlot (Band)

reasoning -MusicMayhem1993 (talk) 02:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC) Please do not delete, I"m still getting more information on the band. I have very little sources, but more are being added as each day goes by.

I've just added more sources, I only have 5 is that going to be enough to help me keep this bands wiki pedia page up and running as I get more information? and when will the error box above the page disappear.

here is the link to the page Harlot (band)

This page is not for asking for help about a page you created; it's for reversing specific types of speedy deletions. Have you tried asking on IRC, in #wikipedia-en-help? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:MusicMayhem1993/Harlot (band). You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Amatulic (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 08:02, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Romagna mia

I was told that in my page (about a song) it was not explained why it was an important song: I said it's a regional anthem of Romagna, Italy. The second reason is that it's not clear whether "the artist's article has never existed": I don't understand how you say that; however was just translating from the italian page. Please undelete -Marco.Ghini1988 (talk) 14:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

mondoclub

hello Yunshui, I have been deleted 2 times for trying to put a page up regarding mondoclub. What do I need to do to make sure I don't get deleted? blogtv, stickam and some of the other live broadcasting sites have pages and since blogtv and stickam shut down I thought it would be good to have a page up to let all these broadcasters who have no home know what other options thy have. thank you in advance. -Ninjamasterrr (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Looked very close to promotional to me as well as not asserting significance. Please read WP:WEB and WP:GNG to get a feel for the required sourcing for us to host an article. If you would like to try again. Please look at WP:AFC where your draft can be reviewed by another editor before going live.  Not done Spartaz Humbug! 18:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Frederick Roy

Contested PROD. As a 2011-12 QMJHL First Team All-Star he meets criteria #4 of WP:NHOCKEY. -Dolovis (talk) 15:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

the underwear expert

many references occur -UE13 (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC) PROD - Page was removed because of lack of references listed. Additional References: NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/fashion/changes-in-the-marketing-of-mens-underwear.html Mens Health: http://www.menshealth.com/style/upgrade-underwear

Thank you for reinstating.

File:Vagina_and_Anus.jpg

reasoning -24.130.145.40 (talk) 02:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC) I want the image because it is not on Flickr anymore.--24.130.145.40 (talk) 02:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

COMO Hotels & Resorts

Because the article was not written to promote -59.163.250.53 (talk) 07:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done But promote it did; please read WP:FAQ/business. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Polytechnic University of the Philippines College of Education

We, the Communications Management Office of PUP, would to request the undeletion of the article "Polytechnic University of the Philippines College of Education". The page has brought information to those who want to know more about the college. One time, the user Xeltran vandalized and attacked the article (and the articles of other colleges) of PUPCoEd. Our editors organized the article but the user Xeltran still kept disorganizing the article. Things got worse when he nominated it for deletion and he, himself, deleted the article. The college, which was the Philippine Business College of the Year and PUP's oldest college, and one of CHEd's premeir center of excellence in teacher education, wants to undelete the article. The college followed the process of request of undeletion in hope they can bring back the article. The process was succesful and it was again free but he user Xeltran again attacked the article by deleting and protecting it. Anyone from the Polytechnic University of the Philippines and its College of Education cannot edit it anymore. We think that it was wrong deletion because its deletion is a result of User vandalism. We, the CMO of PUP, would to take over the article. We would to share the CoEd's achievements in shaping the Philippine Education. We like to get the article unprotected and undeleted. Thank you.

Communications Management Office Polytechnic University of the Philippines -Libertylie (talk) 07:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. Wikipedia is not a "notice-board" site like Myspace or Facebook for people or institutions to write about themselves or post prospectuses or copies of their websites. You want "to take over the article" to tell the world about "the CoEd's achievements", but that is exactly not what Wikipedia is for - it is not a soapbox or means of promotion. In regard to PUPCE you have, from Wikipedia's point of view, a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and should read that guideline and the WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
An encyclopedia is aimed at the general reader, and the sort of detail appropriate for parents or prospective students belongs on the College website, not here. The website can be linked, so that the detail is only one click away from readers who want it. See also WP:Avoid academic boosterism.
The term "vandalism" should be used only for deliberate attempts to damage the encyclopedia, not for edits you happen to disagree with. In regard to user Xeltran's contributions, at a quick look it seems to me that s/he was doing a good job by removing promotional and over-detailed material and attempting to make the article less like a prospectus and more like an encyclopedia article.
This page is not for reversing or disputing the result of deletion discussions. It was decided at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polytechnic University of the Philippines College of Education that the College was best covered by a mention in the article on the parent Polytechnic University of the Philippines. This is often the case - see Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines, particularly the section Faculties and academic colleges
The page has been protected because you have attempted to override the decision of the Articles for Deletion discussion by again posting large amounts of prospectus-type material over the redirect. If you disagree with the AfD decision, you should first approach the administrator who closed it, user Ryan Postlethwaite (talk). Then, if your concerns are not addressed, you may take them to Wikipedia:Deletion review.
JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Gnana Suvidha

It is an advanced ERP for School Management. I can update the wiki page with more real-time information and references , news articles etc -MVSatish (talk) 08:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

NewAgeSys, Inc

The page was written as an article on the company NewAge SMB. This was the first article I wrote and I did not have any intention as specified in the reason for deletion. If it looks like a promotional content, kindly point them out that I will re-edit/remove such contents from the article. -Markstenericks (talk) 10:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

 Not done You would pretty much have to remove all of it - which was done (you even removed "notability not met" tags by another editor!) I'd swear you worked for the company by a) how it was written, and b) how it's possible that you cannot see how promotional it was. Inc Top 5000 is an achievement?? No - not the first time, and not the fifth time either. A shopping cart is a feature worth mentioning? No. None of these add up to the notability requirements, and as Wikipedia is not a business directory I see no way to fix it (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obong umana umana

I, 176.26.89.41, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore it or userfy it as appropriate. 176.26.89.41 (talk) 19:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Note: may be copyvio of [5]. --j⚛e deckertalk 19:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Not done and will not be done. It is indeed largely a copyright violation from sites like this and this. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere unless a formal copyright release is made; but in this case there would be no point, because this material would be quite unacceptable, as being far too promotional in tone. You must write in your own words, keeping to a neutral point of view. JohnCD (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Submissions/Central Asia Consulting Group

I, 178.24.163.186, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore it or userfy it as appropriate. 178.24.163.186 (talk) 19:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done. The notice at the top explains the reasons why it was declined; please edit it to address them, and re-submit. JohnCD (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Wuthering Heights (band)

deleted after prod due to lack of sourcing in article. reliable sources (per WP:ALBUM/REVSIT) exist: [6][7][8]; also the overview [9]], the FA- & RSN-accepted RS [10] and a brief overview & accolade @ Classic Rock [11], perhaps more. -86.42.94.218 (talk) 20:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user TenPoundHammer (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add references to independent reliable sources as soon as possible. JohnCD (talk) 21:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your work. 86.42.94.218 (talk) 22:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Alchemy Gothic

Long standing brand in the Goth scene -86.8.212.141 (talk) 14:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

York Liao

I was not given opportunity to contest unreasonably speedy deletion; subject is notable as awardee of the Member of the Order of the British Empire and the post-honours system Silver Bauhinia Star; both awards make subject notable, IMO. In the event the article is not undeleted please at least restore to my workpage so I can improve and recreate the article. Thanks. Quis separabit? 16:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

    • I see a BLP with no clear assertion of notability that is lacking reliable sources. By no stretch can an MBE (the very lowest rung) be considered an assertion of notability and the silver star looks like its being given to over 20 people a year so I doubt that myself, and again, its not the highest rung - and probably a step up from the MBE. The bottom line for me is that this is an unsourced BLP so I'm not prepared to undelete this myself as I personally consider that to be a controversial move and REFUND is for uncontroversial requests. I won't formally close this as my colleagues may disagree. Spartaz Humbug! 17:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

One Solution CMS

reasoning - Wanted to sandbox the article so I can clean it up. I was trying to fix the issue without it being an advertisement. I understand the conflict of interests here. I was trying to correct all the other issues and maybe have someone who is not in conflict of interests to contribute to the article or approve of it. Didn't have any chance of adding sources because of the speed of deletion went so fast that I didn't have time to correct the issue. This is not what I was expecting. TravisNapoleanSmith (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Have you tried contacting the deleting admin, INeverCry? Perhaps you should ask him directly. Lectonar (talk) 10:59, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Terence Hatton

reasoning -Mr305worldwide (talk) 00:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Auto driver Menace In India

reasoning -112.79.37.159 (talk) 04:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Albert Denis Galloway - Artist and Photographer

I, Jvg73, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jvg73 (talk) 08:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. There is nothing to restore, your entry was blank - nothing on it except the AfC submission template. JohnCD (talk) 09:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Göteborg Futsal Club

The page is about the current Swedish champions in Futsal and is therefore significant info. Goteborg Futsal Club will compete in the UEFA Futsal Cup this year. I created the page yesterday and it was deleted through Speedy Deletion today. -maestro (talk) 10:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. All what you say may be true, but it was not sourced. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Listen to London (1981) Documentary Film

reasoning -Cralia6 (talk) 12:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Listen to London (1981) Documentary Film

Need original text so it can be rewritten properly.

Not done - this page is a copyright violation. If the page belongs to your brother, as you alleged, there should be no problem to get hold of the text....Lectonar (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Pilz (Company)

there are serveral external references that show that Pilz is a leading international company in the field of automation technology. It's nothing different to articles like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SICK_AG or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beckhoff -Safety-Hero (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done The article has not been deleted, and the speedy deletion tag has been removed. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

The Crowded Sky

reasoning -Savolya (talk) 09:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC) This is about a 1960 film, I'm watching right now on TCM

There is no reason to delete a film about the early days of Air Traffic Control and personal drama.

Savolya (talk) 09:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done The page has not been deleted. I have removed the speedy deletion tag, since A7 is not applicable to films. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:13, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

External references as to the director; producer; actors; writers; cinematographer; musical director; editor, film release date etc are IMDb; AllMovie & TCM, who all concur. Why is Matty.007 hell bent on deleting a film that I'm watching? Savolya (talk) 10:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

 Not done Again, as the article is not currently deleted, the above is irrelevant. Please read WP:PROD and attempt to fix the issues noted on the article itself - that being, notability for films has not been established - the mere existence of a film does not make it encyclopedic. He's "hell bent" because right now the article does not meet Wikipedia standards for keeping (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

That is why others join in and evolve a topic that started Savolya (talk) 00:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

KALI BOWYER

reasoning -PeterPiperPickles (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)I DID THE PAGE CORRECT, NOT SURE WHY ONE WOULD CHOOSE TO DELETE

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kali Bowyer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user DGG (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeffrey Steinberger

I, 76.90.186.217, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 76.90.186.217 (talk) 20:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MDLAND's iClinic for Oncology EMR/EHR

I, 50.74.49.218, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 50.74.49.218 (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

 Not done If this was a vanilla G13 deletion I would restore, but this was also very much blatant advertising, subject to WP:CSD#G11 and if I restored I would just need to delete it on a different basis. Also, the page has all the hallmarks of a copy and paste copyvio; I would actually be shocked if it wasn't copied and pasted given the way it is written and formatted, as was noted by the reviewer. For these reasons, I will not undelete it.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

A Place in the Sun; Photographs of Los Angeles by John Humble

{{subst:refund|1= Los Angeles River |2=The title of my book about Los Angeles and the Los Angeles River was inserted into the Los Angeles River article. it was deleted as a conflict of interest. I was not writing about the river or editing the writing, I was just listing my book published by the J. Paul Getty Museum so that people can see my images of the river. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhumble1 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

N Not done Hi Jhumble1. This page is for requesting the undeletion of pages that were deleted, by administrators, and can only be reversed by administrators. While I understand the source of the confusion—the content you added was "deleted" in the sense that another user reverted your edits—that is not the type of deletion this page is about. The revision where you added the content remains in the page's history and anyone can "undelete" it; this page is unrelated to that type of undeletion issue. What I suggest is that you post to the article's talk page explaining why you think the content belongs.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

The Gonnabees

An actual pop group that had a major hit in New York City. Album available on Amazon and iTunes -174.63.23.72 (talk) 03:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user TenPoundHammer (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add independent references to show how they meet the notability standard of WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Vivasky

A satellite television broadcasting 2014 world cup in indonesia -Nathan tanara (talk) 03:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Tempest (Christian rock band)

Tempest was a great christian metal band from the 80s. I saw them live twice. They had two studio albums that were sold in record stores. I bought both. To say they were not The lead singer became the lead singer for Guardian. You did not delete Guardian. to say Article about a band without assertion of notability is rediculous when there album was in record stores nationwide before that was as easy as posting to iTunes. -68.119.52.217 (talk) 23:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Tznkai (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to show how they meet the notability standard of WP:MUSIC. JohnCD (talk) 08:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steve Kravac

I, Sternisha, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Sternisha (talk) 00:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DENIM GARMENT WET PROCESSING

I, 121.52.157.170, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 121.52.157.170 (talk) 07:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SPACEWatch (software)

I, Sharpeware, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Sharpeware (talk) 12:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done As an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, this has been restored upon request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher Howard

I, Grafikart, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Grafikart 15:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done As an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, this has been restored upon request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Said Khoury

It's a well known businessman and billionaire 1, Forbes Magazine listed him before his death as one of the wealthiest men in the world 2 --Katous1978 (talk) 12:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Taylor Beck

To restore edit history of recently recreated article (now recreated as Taylor Beck (ice hockey)) -Dolovis (talk) 18:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Kandanoria

reasoning -OmicronEnoch (talk) 03:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC) I received the noticed that my article was speedily deleted. Is there a way I can get the article back so I can improve it? It looks like the issue was that there was no reference to why the article was noteworthy. It also cited it was because it was a website, but it is not just about a website, though I did use the official website as a reference. OmicronEnoch (talk) 03:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The CaptureIT Time and Attendance System

I, 212.57.225.110, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 212.57.225.110 (talk) 08:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

The CaptureIT Time and Attendance System

requires editing -212.57.225.110 (talk) 08:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

User:Jmcfarland27/Chris Diorio

I, Jmcfarland27, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jmcfarland27 (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; articles for creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

KIdsSpeak International

reasoning -Shodobrown (talk) 19:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 

Dont delete it please it is a real company go to kidsspeakinternational.com for more information.
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about organization. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. It has also not been restored because it read as unambiguous advertising or promotion. Furthermore, the title has been protected against re-creation because it was created multiple times.---Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

New_Earth_Coffeehouse

The New Earth Coffeehouse is of great interest to music lovers. A great number of bands (such as Jennifer Knapp, MxPx, and others) have performed there throughout the years. One of the most notable of these performances was the band Waterdeep, which recorded a major album "Live at the New Earth" at this location in 1999. The Wikipedia page "Waterdeep_(band)" provides some additional details. -JonathanDavidArndt (talk) 17:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies or organizations. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 18:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_91&oldid=1138664802"