Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 84

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 80←Archive 82Archive 83Archive 84Archive 85Archive 86→Archive 90

Mazhar_Mallouhi

Mallouhi is a significant figure in Muslim-Christian relations and the page should not be deleted simply because of lack of proper documentation. -Chicomatic (talk) 08:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done Having looked over the deleted versions of the article, there's virtually nothing there that could be reused; the grossly POV tone and lack of citations make it thoroughly unsuitable for Wikipedia. A better course of action would be to recreate the page from scratch, using reliable sources and neutral language. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:09, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Paradigm Electronics

I am researching speaker manufacturers in Canada who use Double Blind Studies -220.233.92.97 (talk) 13:52, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done There was nothing in the article which can not be found on the company's website. Lectonar (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Ziron

The page has been deleted several times, i'm pretty sure it passes the wikipedia criteria and is being deleted by those that have no knowledge in programming or programming languages, it was stated that it did not have notable sources, which were added, the following list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_programming_languages is a list of programming languages which has many that have almost no notability which all remain, after trying to leave a response about the deletion, the comment was just deleted without an answer, this seems to be some admins abusing their rights without good reason to delete the article. -78.83.46.47 (talk) 14:30, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziron, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Lectonar (talk) 14:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Ziron

Have been accessing this article with no problem for some time until recently, might we have it back please? See no reason whatsoever for it to have been removed but yes many thanks and be back soon to check. Cheerio -77.99.246.3 (talk) 14:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done See above....and what a surprise that 2 users just happen to post the same request for the same deleted article in 10 minutes....Lectonar (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Medarametla

I want to create a page named "Medarametla", but I came to know that a page created with name Medarametla was deleted before. I want to have a copy of the deleted page, so that I wont make the same mistakes while creating a new page for Medarametla. -Samba.ravi (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

There was nothing there; the entire "article" consisted of a gibberish sentence along the lines of, "teh greate persons from medarametla- sri so-and-so-patel" --Orange Mike | Talk 20:21, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Under_Control_(album)

I do believe that Cary Brothers' second album, Under Control, is a notable album. I will try to find some sources for this album. The article was deleted because there was no sources to prove that this was a notable album. thanks 1ragincajun (talk) 20:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC) -1ragincajun (talk) 20:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Greetings 1ragincajun. This page has not been deleted, but merely redirected by GB fan (talk · contribs). By going to the page's history you can restore the article and add your sources, but consider asking Stefan2 (talk · contribs) (the editor who proposed the page for deletion) for his/her thoughts. Let me know if you have any questions, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:24, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

File:KirkDouglasKey.jpg

presentation photo of deceased ambassador Walter Nathan Tobriner; there are no free images [1]; rationale added as required -198.24.31.118 (talk) 21:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Done Please add required info. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:43, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

file:Superf*ckers Poster.png

I did not have time to respond to deletion notification and so could not make changes requested. Rationale needs to be added -Donjuaninhell (talk) 19:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Done Timer reset, but the article will only need one Fair use file. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:27, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Andrew Payne

Article was speedily deleted under criteria A7: "Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject" but the article mentioned that Payne played senior cricket for Somerset. While the terminology is vague, the indicates that he meets WP:CRIN, and should certainly not have been speedily deleted. A reference was present in the article, albeit not an inline reference. -Harrias talk 17:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Suggest you bring thus up with JamesBWatson who deleted the page that actually had been created in 2005. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:24, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Bruce McMahan

This guy is a philanthropist, billionaire, involved with Maxximus G-Force compressed air race car. Makes no sense that this article has been removed. Xpapax (talk) 20:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce McMahan (3rd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. In particular, Xpapax, do you know of any sources that firmly establish notability of this subject? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:28, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
It should be noted that this article has been suppressed, supposedly on WP:BLP grounds, but apparently actually because of fear that billionaire McMahan might sue the Wikimedia Foundation for reporting what has made press all over the world. A purported lack of notability is the feeble excuse on which this expurgation was hung, even though a google for his name will easily yield what is public record, as widely reported. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:26, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Darrell Waltrip pitstop, Winner of 1983 Marty Robbins 420, Nashville, TN.jpg,

I own the copyright. I was the photographer. The person who requested deletion of this image stated that it was a scan of a picture. Since the photo was taken in 1983 it was film photography not digital. I know of no other way to transfer a photograph from 1983 other than to scan it. I will be happy to sign and have notarized an affidavit stating that I am the legal and only owner of the copyright as it is my photograph. -Billferguson0422 02:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Done For a start, please add info to it. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

constant rijkenberg

He is notable for winning $2 million in a poker tournament and for winning an EPT event. See wikiproject:poker for notability requirements, both of these qualify -DegenFarang (talk) 08:23, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Constant_Rijkenberg, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jayjg (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Kadda Sheekoff

I wish to have this article undeleted, because everything on it it's real -Kadda Sheekoff 15:23, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:27, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Alphonse Allais - Funeral March for the Obsequies of a Deaf Man.ogg

While I admit the file is silly, that's Allais' point. We also have his completely white canvas. "First Communion of Anaemic Young Girls In The Snow". He's one of the predecessors of the Dadaists; that it's bizarre is the entire point. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Done The file description could make clearer, however, that it illustrates a silent composition. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:10, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Dahlem Centre of Plant Sciences

OTRS ticket allowed. Talk page create by. - +Prince Willy 21:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Done by Hut 8.5. Needs a complete rewrite anyways. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

chess.com

The site is clearly noteworthy. It is a major chess site, more relevant than other sites which have articles here.

Several news sources mention chess.com with a clear expectation the reader will understand what the site is. Therefore, it is notable enough for mention here.

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=chess.com&oq=chess.com&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i400.1123.1797.0.2021.9.7.0.0.0.0.153.489.3j2.5.0...0.0...1ac.1.BBvsURipRTA-68.191.217.206 (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done This is already being reviewed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 February 9 and as a contested deletion discussion wouldn't be handled here in any case. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

List of female cabinet ministers of Israel

Lists of important political figures who belong to groups often marginalized in politics are generally encyclopedic on principle, and this one is also part of a large series of similar articles for other countries. -–Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

John B. Kimble

reasoning -68.50.111.217 (talk) 06:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC) The article was deleted even though there was no consensus at all. Therefore the subject article should be replaced and back on Wikipedia in the interests of being a fair and balanced online encyclopedia.68.50.111.217 (talk) 06:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

John B. Kimble

reasoning -68.50.111.217 (talk) 06:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

The article was deleted even though there was no consensus at all. Therefore the subject article should be replaced and back on Wikipedia in the interests of being a fair and balanced online encyclopedia.68.50.111.217 (talk) 06:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

IndieGameReviewer.com

article was only just in creation and was prematurely deleted. More citations and references were to be added. -ArchKali (talk) 07:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Done Userfied by deleting admin, Bbb23. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Athenry fc

reasoning -109.77.255.204 (talk) 09:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi was looking for the page relating to athenry fc a soccer club in the Republic of Ireland but it has been deleted I didn't write the page but have recently begun the website www.athenrysoccer.com and just noticed it had gone shortly after I edited the page to show a link to this notable soccer club which is well known in Ireland

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athenry F.C., it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Llandegfan Antelope FC

This article provides information regarding a football club which is part of the Welsh football pyramid. If this page is to be deleted, then surely pages concerning all other clubs in the pyramid should be considered for deletion? I don't see how this page differs from any other page concerning a Football Club. The Anglesey Football League, of which this Club forms part of, is of specific interest to football fans and this page provides information about one of the Clubs in that League. I was due to create pages providing information regarding the other Clubs in the League and this deletion has been a huge setback. Please bring the page back. -Sonaefc (talk) 10:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Scott_Anderson_(pilot)

Scott Anderson was the Chief Test pilot for Cirrus. He was also the first person killed in one. And finally his crash has been used as evidence in a future civil lawsuit. Finally, it appears as though many of the PROD author's edits at the time of the PROD were not considered correct or acceptable. This article, though important, would not have been viewed by anyone within the 7 day PROD period (in order to object). -Jpperich (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. —C.Fred (talk) 01:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

fetish_(band)

This band was very influential in 90's South African rock music and was only deleted due to the limited web presence a defunct 90's band in South Africa would have had! the band is now touring and have released a new album. See also http://www.rock.co.za/legends/90s/fetish_index.html or http://www.discogs.com/artist/Fetish and the Mail and Guardian, an influential South African newspaper http://mg.co.za/article/2012-10-29-fetish -196.35.246.194 (talk) 12:59, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done The deletion discussion was clear but also four years ago, so maybe with a new album and tour things may change. Nevertheless, we only do uncontroversial restorations here, and you've already brought this to deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:13, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

CW World Heavyweight Championship

I have founded the Championship in question. I made an article about it. Who are you to say whether it's real or not? Since it is real. -Cowcowgarcia (talk) 15:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. --Tikiwont (talk) 15:57, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Gibraltar Open

reasoning -178.208.193.45 (talk) 22:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)


This is massively confusing and I am unclear how to request the undeletion of a page. There are too many complicated rules and procedures. I wish the page for Gibraltar Open Darts Tournament be reinstated. I cannot find the reason why it was deleted, or who by, it was being updated every year with the winners of that years' event, and I fail to understand the purpose of its deletion. How do I get it put back? Please help, Wikipedia is massively confusing for the layman.

There is no point telling me to contact the admin who deleted it as I have no idea who it was or how to find out.

Thank you.

 Not done. Yes, it's a bit of a jungle, but there are human guides. If you click on the "redlink" above, you will see the deletion log entry which shows that it was deleted by user Addshore (talk) as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Open which covered a number of similar pages. If you think that discussion was wrongly decided, or you have more information, you should first ask Addshore; then, if not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. The reason for deletion is to do with Wikipedia:Notability, which is the criterion used to decide what shall be included. The test of notability is whether there has been "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - have people independent of the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? JohnCD (talk) 23:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
FYI - this was also taken to WP:DRV where the instructions are admittedly complex. It was opened at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 February 18 in the middle of another discussion. I have separated the two and added the relevant tags including the group-AFD you linked to. Hopefully IP will be able to make his/her case there. Stalwart111 00:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Jules Bruchez

reasoning -76.26.65.40 (talk) 06:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

ghushmeshwar_jyotirlinga

reasoning -1.38.28.7 (talk) 11:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

this page have rightly information about 12th jyotirlinga of india. proof of this is www.ghushmeshwar.com please undelete my page ghushmeshwar_jyotirlinga on wikipedia.

Jesse Quin & The Mets

The article was orginally deleted as the page was claimed to be "unremarkable" and did not contribute to Wikipedia as it did not contain as much information as was necessary. However, Jesse Quin & The Mets are however a well known band, with many famous members from very famous bands such as Keane, Mt Desoaltion and Mumford and Sons. I do no think these band's articles would be complete without this page demonstrating their history. If it was reinstated, I would improve the quality of the information within. -81.131.236.224 (talk) 18:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Alex Goot

Hello, I represent an artist named Alex Goot, owner and primary contributor to the very popular Youtube.com/Gootmusic channel. In addition to accumulating almost 1 million subscribers on YouTube, holding several top 100 spots on Worldwide channel ranking lists, Alex has helped to launch the careers of several other artists and groups whose wikipedia pages have been deemed relevant. Alex has also won an MTV award for his videos (see http://www.mtv.com/photos/o-music-awards/1662701/6080293/photo.jhtml#6080293 ) and was recently nominated for a Streamy award for best Original song (http://www.streamys.org/nominees-winners/3rd-annual-nominees/ ). Alex is constantly on the road, and sells out venues across the world. We'd like to request that Alexs Wikipedia page be restored, being included in Wikipedia is a point of pride for artists like alex, and we feel that we owe it to ourselves and to Alexs fans to get his page reinstated. Thank you very much, if you have any additional questions or require any information on my end feel free to contact me at thank you -Mikeferri (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Goot, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. As an aside, having an encyclopedia article about you should never be a source of pride - after all, thousands of people wish that an article about them did not exist. Wikipedia articles do not grant notability - you have to be notable first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 19:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

maryse letarte

added required references -Pierre Girardin (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

The Nature's Co.

We are in process to create our company's wiki page, though the content i put earlier was not the final content, but it's in deletion process, so please stop its deletion, thanks. -115.248.228.42 (talk) 06:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Since you are editing while logged out, I also have no way of checking your contribution history to locate the page. Please log in and repeat your request, giving the correct name of the page concerned. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:59, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 Not done It looks to be User:The Nature's Co. which was deleted because it was too much like an advertisement. the user cannot edit here due to being blocked with softerblock because of using a company username. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Ooh, good find. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Vedas and Puranas

reasoning -Vinkumji (talk) 12:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

M/s Wikipedia, I am requestibg for undeletion of my recent page that has been deleted. Actually the page was not COMPLETED so that I could write all its features like its Importance and all that stuff. So as a matter of fact, you deleted it. Never mind but please do me a small favour, please undo this act of deletion so that I could add more to the content of the page and it is quite beneficial for the people living worldwide. Thank you, Vinkumji

Not done The website you are trying to write an article about has been established only a week ago. So, you can go ahead and create an article in your userspace. Please follow the advice gven here, especially the part about reliable sourcing to establish the notability. I think a look at WP:COI should not hurt either. Lectonar (talk) 12:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscious_business

Deleted by a user who has since retired (Fastily) for no sensible reason that I can see -Redwaterjug (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

WorkBook_Software_A/S

Even though the writer is occupied in the company doesn't make it a bad article nor untruthful. There were even other contributors to the article. Please bring it back online. -93.163.44.158 (talk) 12:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. This article falls under the criteria for speedy deletion due to its promotional nature. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Buddy Parker (Principal)

This principal is very notable. His school has been mentioned various times in USA Today and the like. He is a long time administrator, and has overseen numerous notable events. Other principals of his caliber are listed here. I would like to see some reasoning for why this page was speedily deleted. -Themane2 (talk) 02:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Sonar (Transformers)

Please place the original article (before it was a redirect) in my userspace so I can work on the article. Thank you. -Mathewignash (talk) 12:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Turkeys (film)

This was deleted as a "blatant hoax", but it is very much real, and various current Hollywood luminaries are set to star. Viz http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118066492/ and http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/turkeys-gets-greenlight-at-reel-fx-72378.html -2602:306:C4B1:55F0:11EC:AD2B:B5FA:4702 (talk) 04:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

EduWel Foundation

it was created to tel people of the activity the EduWel group was doing to empower people, remove unemployment and generate the source of income for those who are below poverty line -122.170.101.229 (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Comment: as I was one of the admins who deleted this, I will leave your request for someone else to answer, but read Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. JohnCD (talk) 00:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Rock Cottage

reasoning -Geography 2013 (talk) 14:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

J. Nigro Sansonese

reasoning -Anadessma (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Mid Atlantic JSA region

reasoning -Creativeminds34 19:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Malformed request - please use {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request).. The page Mid Atlantic region JSA has not been deleted, it is currently a redirect to Junior State of America. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

K-Arrow Ranch

Deleted under wrong criteria and with no discussion. I created the initial revision of a history article less than 12 hours ago. This evening I log on to find that it got nominated for speedy deletion under some speedy deletion criteria about it being an article about a non-notable company or organization. I tried to contest via the talk page per instructions yet less than 2 minutes later the article is deleted. I don't think the deleting administrator even saw my rebuttal. It was not an article about a company or organization and did not fall under the speedy deletion criteria it was nominated for. It was a stub history article about a ranch in California with only the initial revision. I am only a part-time editor and do not spit out fully-formed articles in less than 12 hours. I would appreciate it to be restored so that I may continue working on it. Thank you. -Stacey Doljack Borsody (talk) 04:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Sborsody/K-Arrow Ranch. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Jinian (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Jared Byers

Jared is now in a two time grammy award winning band, audio adrenaline, and a well respected drummer who formerly played with bleach, relient k, the rocket summer, and the honeymoon thrillers. -98.240.93.169 (talk) 04:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

AETCNRC

we are a national, federally funded organization. Our Wikipedia page merely describes the organization's mission & goals, and promotes its services. Our page is not self-serving or spam as it was tagged in the speedy deletion notice. -AETC National Resource Center 14:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aetcnrc (talk • contribs) — Aetcnrc (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Not done and will not be done "Our Wikipedia page... promotes its services"! Please read WP:PROMOTE. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Meta-programs

The person who deleted the page Meta-programs doesn't know anything about the subject - while several of the contributors to the page Meta-programs are well-known trainers & published authors on this subject ~~PatrickMerlevede~~ -PatrickMerlevede (talk) 15:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anchoring (NLP), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spinningspark (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Gagan_Palrecha

this article is about a record producer that has produced and released some influential underground albums. It's a shame if the page gets permanently deleted. Perhaps the article needs to be updated to include the extent of the influential works, whcih I'd be happy to do once restored. -Gstarsf (talk) 20:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Antony le Fleming

I have verified a review of a CD of his music in BBC Music Magazine. Also past and scheduled performances of his music by a recognized musical group outside the UK. I will add references to these in the article if it is restored, and will attempt to track down the other excerpted reviews. -MorphismOfDoom (talk) 00:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

List of Grabby Recipients

Despite the assertion that this is a dubious award, it is the oldest and only current award to address this media type in existence and this is the only ongoing preservation of the winners -146.74.1.99 (talk) 03:17, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. The article you are here about was actually redirected rather than deleted—at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Grabby recipients—but the issue is the same. We do not undelete article that were deleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article's merits were debated, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Acidic (band)

The creators did not delete and did not want it to be deleted -69.234.100.38 (talk) 19:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Carter (Real Estate)

reasoning -Sduncan87 (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


Carter is developing The Banks, which has a Wikipedia pagee with a link to Carter, which is a blank page. Also, the Georgia State Roadway and Toll Authority has selected Carter to begin negotiations for the relocations of the Amtrak and Greyhound stations, which is a closely followed story in the Southeast. View an article about it here. Please restore this page.

This is the message we received:

A page with this title has previously been deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

17:43, 26 February 2013 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted page Carter (real estate) (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: A7: Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

Dane Witherspoon

Expired PROD was deleted in September 2008. The subject is a popular redlink at WP:TOPRED. Google news archives now offer sources not available in 2008 that demonstrate notability. I will add more sourcing. -Milowent • hasspoken 20:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taukei_ni_Waluvu

reasoning -Jonocan (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

7 Photo Images from NZ Turnbull Library have been deleted. Do they violate copyright?

THis is more a question for WP:Media copyright questions. For the map of Fiji, this is not fair use, as it is replacable by a newly drawn map. For File:Meke iri-bitu.jpg there is a very good chance this is public domain, taken in 1881, but you would have to know Fiji or NZ copyright law, and whether this was published before. File:Meke Wau nakorovatu,1881.jpg also likely PD, File:14-L.jpg is certainly public domain as over 70 years passed since the death of the painter, even before US had URAA restrictions introduced. All the other images from 1881 or earlier are likely to be public domain. However they are not deleted so nothing to do here yet. Please check if they are public domain and relabel the images appropriately with correct licenses. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Fenway_Park,_September_15th,_2009.jpeg

This image, on the Amalgamates page was mass-deleted without any review. I have the rights to to upload this image--it does not violate copyright. -Glevy01 (talk) 05:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Timiskaming Square

Just because a mall for a small town in Northern Ontario, Canada; does not appear in Google News or Google Books, does not mean that the wiki page will not be able to help people looking into the area. Any tourist ( A major player in the town) would like to know whats going on in the mall, where it is, why its their and more. Also anyone from the area would like to know the history of said establishment. -Havidredden (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a venue for articles about subjects which are already notable. We are not a tourist guide for small malls, undiscovered restaurants, and the like; a subject must have already become notable enough to be described in books, magazines, newspapers, etc. in order to find a place here. We have nothing against the folks of Temiskaming Shores; but on a globe of 7-8 billion people, we can't cover everything and everybody. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:17, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

jQuery TE

reasoning -Fattihkoca (talk) 20:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. Wikipedia is not a product listing directory. Articles need to show references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability; you should also read the guideline on WP:Conflict of interest. The title has been protected because of repeated re-creation: if you think you can show notability, you should contact the deleting administrator, user NawlinWiki (talk). JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

David Fanning (filmmaker)

Article was CSD'ed under a copyvio (G12), but the page it referenced actually uses our same license (although I don't know if that was the case when it was deleted). PBS notified us via OTRS ticket:2013022810000571. Thanks. -§FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:17, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Merry Alpern

The article's creator is interested in further developing the article; I have suggested he do so in his userspace. He would like for it to be undeleted/userfied so that he can use it as a base. dci | TALK 02:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC) -dci | TALK 02:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

 Done - the article contained only 17 words but, such as it is, I have userfied it to User:SamChristopherCornwell/Merry Alpern. JohnCD (talk) 11:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Neudesic

Researching ESB companies and this company came up. I would have liked to see a wiki page on them, but it's been deleted. -68.4.186.10 (talk) 05:48, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Woolley Moor United F.C.

The article, though somewhat short, was well-written and relatively well-sourced. The reason for deletion was that the club is not notable enough to warrant its having a separate page. However, it would seem to me that Woolley Moor United F.C.'s having existed for more than a century does make it worthy of having a Wikipedia article or at least of not having said article deleted without a proper discussion. -188.125.142.180 (talk) 09:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Jeremy Nicholas (writer)

This page has been removed unilaterally by an internet vandal. Reasons given were that content was 'improperly sourced and could not be verified' - but all the content of the Wiki entry was checked against Jeremy Nicholas's own website (www.jeremynicholas.com), data on IMBd's website and other freely available sources. There was no promotional material in the content. This deletion is a misuse of Wiki's editorial guidance. -Orange Mike | Talk 15:29, 28 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicky Forton (talk • contribs) 15:12, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Neither the subject's own website nor the IMDb is considered a reliable source. Accusing another editor of being "an internet vandal" is not appropriate behavior, nor is it wise for someone requesting assistance from a group of volunteers. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:29, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

studsat-2

the article should not be deleted as its about a student satellite project which is under progress, there are references also about this artice in various international organisation. The project was presented at United nations conference in nagoya,japan. For further information the website of team studsat i.e, www.teamstudsat.com can be referred. Thank you -210.212.203.66 (talk) 10:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

David Lory Vanderbeek

I user ghoyt98, request David_Lory_Vanderbeek wikipedia page to be restored, for the following reasons. David Lory Vanderbeek is a real person, and a politician. He is the candidate for governor of Nevada under the ticket of the Constitution Party in 2014 and he deserves to be on wikipedia. The article was delete by administrator -iNeverCry, that user dislikes David Lory Vanderbeek because of political reasons, which I think is wrong. So Wikipedia please restore it -Ghoyt98 (talk) 01:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. "went virtually unmentioned" is a clue that there are no reliable sources on the subject. Also the deletion was not "because of political reasons", but because of a lack of a claim of importance. If you can find reliable independent references you will be able to show notability. Linkedin, Wikipedia and YouTube are not reliable sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Commtel Networks

We were not duly communicated about the 'specific' changes required on our Commtel Networks page. Kindly upload the page and highlight the areas where the changes are to be made, so that we can take requisite steps and get the page back online. We don't mean to advertise/promote our content, it's just another medium to let people know and understand better what Commtel does. The page was deleted by J04n at 14:33, on 26 February 2013. Requesting you to review your decision and help us in getting the page back on Wikipedia. Thanks and Regards -Commtel Networks (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commtel Networks, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user J04n (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. I appreciate your politeness though! The specific requirements are available WP:ORG, and for the article it needed more reliable independent newspaper articles. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:26, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

DesignInquiry

reasoning -GabrielleEsperdy (talk) 18:23, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Although this was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DesignInquiry, the closing administrator declared it a SOFTDELETE, so the article has been restored on request. JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Akoustik

"there is no real reason IMO to single out this one particular page (which is ONE of associated 13 album pages) for deletion" [Guy Manning] -GuyManning (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

  •  Not done First, it's not been deleted - its content is supposed to have been merged elsewhere and deleted, but it's not deleted yet. Second, wow ... WP:COI? Third, the article as it sits is barely anything but a track listing and shows no sign of individual notability. As such, merge was obviously correct - the existence of the album is not sufficient to create notability (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Yeah WOW! COI? (these pages are about me and such I have a passing interest about the previous nonsense that was posted on the pages, hence my originally adding objective ONLY content to them to make them at least accurate) Why this one page though??...all the other 12 album pages are just the same...you cannot possibly merge all that info successfully onto one page IMO..so I suggest deleting the whole site about ME as none of it seems notable and certainly not by your very stringent standards ..and then there is the matter that having passed judgement, nobody actually has gone on to actually do anything about merging or the like [G Manning]!

Talk:AE Andromedae/workpage

does not qualify for G8 deletion, it is a subpage of a talkpage that has an article AE Andromedae, therefore it is not a talkpage of a nonexistant page. Otherwise, all talk archives could be deleted as they are also talk pages with redlinked subject pages. It is also properly referred to from the main talk page, as a subsidiary page, so is not unlinked or lost. -65.92.180.137 (talk) 14:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

 Done. I have added template {{G8-exempt}} which may protect it in future. JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Gibraltar Open Darts

The Gibraltar Open Darts tournament page has been deleted for an unknown reason. I have no idea how to find out who deleted it or what to do about it. The wiki procedures are highly confusing to the novice and almost impossible to follow (we are advised to contact the admin that deleted the article, but are not told how to find out who it was) I am deeply upset that this article was deleted for no apparent reason but have no idea how to restore it. Please help in any way you can. I am confused by the whole wiki system -212.120.238.173 (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. If you click on the "redlink" Gibraltar Open you will see the deletion log which shows you who deleted it (user J04n (talk)) and why (the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colorado Open (darts), covering a number of similar articles). These were all nominated after a deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 February 18 because of procedural defects in the previous deletion nomination.
The reason for deletion is that these tournaments do not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criterion of WP:Notability which requires references that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See WP:ANS for what that means. If you can show such coverage (of the event itself, not of people who participated), you should first approach J04n as the closing administrator; then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go back to Deletion review. But unless you can show "significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" you will be wasting your time. JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Boots.svg

The vector version of the Boots logo appears to have been removed from the article by mistake and deleted. It was the best version of the logo available, and was replaced by a grainy JPEG file. It was deleted under reason F5 as an unused non-free file. If restored it will be added back to the Boots UK article straight away. -Cloudbound (talk) 20:09, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

 Done 1) I have fixed the SVG. 2) It is actually ineligible for copyright in the US (but don't move it to Commons since it's copyrighted in the UK). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks! Cloudbound (talk) 23:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_84&oldid=1140261369"