Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Jack Baker (activist)

Jack Baker (activist)

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Y6f&tP4z (talk · contribs) – filing party

Articles affected by this dispute

Jack Baker (activist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

Talk:Jack_Baker_(activist)#No proof is offered to demonstrate that this article lacks neutrality

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

Why is the neutrality of this article in dispute?

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Y6f&tP4z (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Recommend rejection. — No talk page discussion (at the article talk page or elsewhere) to satisfy listing prerequisite that there be extensive talk page discussion before requesting mediation. Indeed, no dispute at all (no edits to article talk page by anyone other than the requesting editor since July 4, 2013; no edits to the article by anyone other than the requesting editor since July 23). — TransporterMan (TALK) 16:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC) (member, Mediation Committee)

• Objection is confirmed - "No talk page discussion" to justify the claim that there is indeed a dispute. That message should be removed from the introduction to the article. Y6f&tP4z (talk) 17:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

• Reject. Mediation occurs between two parties. Since there is only one party, there is nothing to mediate. For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 12:30, 24 October 2013 (UTC)