Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Ganesh (musée d'art asiatique de Berlin).jpg
Appearance
A nice representation of a dancing Ganesha, and the play of light and shade. Big enough. Encyclopaedic value can be evaluated by knowing the following aspects from article FA Ganesha quoting:
- "He (Ganesha) may be portrayed standing, dancing,"
- "Ganesha is often shown riding on or attended by a mouse or rat."
- "The number of Ganesha's arms varies; his best-known forms have between two and sixteen arms." - eight arms here.
- Creator
- Jean-Pierre Dalbéra, uploaded by redtigerxyz
- Nominated by
- Redtigerxyz Talk 17:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
Yes, this image is encyclopedic but it is unlikely to succeed at FPC because:
- There's enough purple and green chromatic aberration to make me reach for my 3D glasses.
- The shadows are full of chromatic noise and occasionally obscure detail.
- The subject is poorly cut out, see e.g. top centre and bottom right.
Hope this helps. MER-C 04:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- The subject is not cut off, the sculpture is like that. Can the chromatic aberration be corrected? --Redtigerxyz Talk 04:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- With the stock photoshop lens distortion filters CA can be improved in some areas, but it seems to make it worse in others, you could try spending a few hours selectively desaturating the cyan channel to improve matters, I don't know if it'd help red without effecting the rest of the image though. I'd like to add to the list that whoever cut out the image from it's background did a pretty average job, the square edges of the cropping are extremely clear. You would probably be better off with a black point adjustment if you were trying to kill noise. Noodle snacks (talk) 07:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- The subject is not cut off, the sculpture is like that. Can the chromatic aberration be corrected? --Redtigerxyz Talk 04:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Seconder