Wikipedia:Peer review/Sindhis/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it has been a very long time since the article was peer reviewed or possibly might've never been under a peer-review before, Between November 2022 and April 2023 the article went under a general overhaul via which alot of necessary information was added, after all that I believe an external instance on this topic is now crucial and I request a peer-review
Thanks, ⭐️ Starkex ⭐️ 📧 ✍️ 10:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Z1720
[edit]Comments after a quick skim:
- "Wink 2002, p. 203." What source is this? There's no full citation to an author named Wink.
- "McIntosh 2008, p. 387:" Same as above
- "Dyson 2018, p. 29" Same as above
- "Wright 2009," Same as above.
- Quotes are usually not necessary in the inline citations, as the reader can look up the source themselves to verify the information. Examples include refs 157, 158, 159
- Per MOS:ALLCAPS, titles of works and publishers should not be in all caps in the references sections. Examples include refs 149, 151, 110.
- Why is 137 a reliable source?
- Most paragraphs in the article should have an inline citation at the end of the last sentence. Exceptions include the lede.
- The Festivals section suffers from MOS:OVERSECTION and should be divided.
- There are no citations in the Notable people section, which need to be included to verify that these people are part of the Sindhis group
- Per WP:RS/P, Joshua Project is considered an unreliable source and should be removed from the article.
- Notes need a citation at the end of each one.
I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 19:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC)