Wikipedia:Peer review/Oil/archive1

Oil

Very important topic as it is *meant* to summarize all the different types of oil. Seriosuly needs work - suggestions/comments? — Wackymacs 06:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles).

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.

Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.

This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.
- To assist you with this, add {{subst:js|User:AndyZ/monobook.js/footnotehelper.js}} to your monobook.js file (mine is located at User:AndyZ/monobook.js) and then bypass your browser's cache by pressing: Mozilla/Safari/Konqueror: hold down Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl-Shift-R), Internet Explorer: press Ctrl-F5, Opera: press F5. In editing mode, click on the "Footnote creater" tab that appears.

The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.

This article may be a bit list-weighty; in other words, some of the lists should be converted to prose (paragraph form).

Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
Thanks, Andy _t 15:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start with one issue: the artcle needs expantion, it is now barerly more then a stub. Second, the article has no references. These issues should be addressed first, then we can go into other details.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 21:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]