Wikipedia:Peer review/Microsoft Security Essentials/archive1
Appearance
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I wanted a broader view on how this article can be improved. I've worked on it, trying to use the most reliable references and expanded it substantially. Now, I'm fresh out of ideas for this article. I just need to update it a bit once the final release comes out.
Thanks in advance TechOutsider (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- Morro should be in italics consistently.
- 'Microsoft is specfically targeting computer users without...' - could you explain briefly why they're targeting this specific market?
- 'lacking ... non-anti-malware functionality' - I don't understand this - how does a combined anti-virus and anti-malware program lack non-anti-malware functionality? Perhaps a little rewording would clarify.
A quick review of h2g2 in return would be appreciated. Thanks. AlexAshman (talk) 14:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the comments. Quick clarification for you, and I will be sure to fix in the article, "non-anti-malware" functionality", I believe, the original editor, refers to everything but anti-malware capibilities. OneCare, for example, can backup files. Not malware related. I will look at h2g2. TechOutsider (talk • contribs) 19:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)