Wikipedia:Peer review/Black Majesty/archive1

Black Majesty

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because, quite simply, I wish to find out what else I can do to improve the article's quality.

Thanks, Inf666 (talk) 00:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)

Rightyho, some comments on where to go from here...

Expand the lead, take a look at WP:LEAD for advice. A single sentence simply isn't sufficient.
As per the warning templates at the top of the page, references are needed for this article to be anything other than a B-class article.
Minor manual of style issues such as the use of an en-dash to separate years (so, in the infobox, you should have 2002–present, not 2002 - Present...)
The article suffers a little from assuming that the reader is completely commensurate with the musical genre. I'm not, and find phrases like "hair metal" a bit confusing.
The subsection "Black Majesty" needs to be expanded and preferably renamed, it's a bit odd having the name of the article as also the name of a subsection of the article.

That's about it for me. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]