Wikipedia:Peer review/Art Data Interactive/archive1

Art Data Interactive

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

This is the first B level article I've put together where I've compiled several sources to form a comprehensive summary of a topic. Because there's a lot of content, I'd like to know if I'm on the right track with conforming with GA standards, and would like some help with identifying where I can develop my skills better when drafting against Wikipedia's good article conventions.

Thanks, Vrxces (talk) 11:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720

Here are some comments after a quick skim:

The lede should be expanded to include a summary of the major topics mentioned in the article.
There should be a citation at the end of each paragraph, minimum.
A lot of the article is about the games, and not necessarily about the company. I suggest reading Namco, one of Wikipedia's featured articles, and structure this article similarly.
Dissolution needs more information. Why was the company dissolved?
Unreleased projects can be merged together to avoid WP:OVERSECTION or just removed.
IMDB cannot be used as a source.
Not sure if ref 9 is a reliable source

Hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 23:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vrxces: to ensure they saw the above. Z1720 (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since the nominator has not responded to the above ping, I am going to close this PR. A new PR can be opened when the above are considered for the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]