The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This image is not exactly equal to the svg version and a request for improvement at the graphics lab is current. Deletion is premature. Rmhermen (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Yes, I removed it, myself, as there are far better things that can be done, like adding fair-use rationales oneself, which persistent deletionists seem to turn a blind eye to. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 04:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE TO ADMINS Please visit Mangwanani's talk page-Jackaranga has recently nominated 19 images for deletion. At some point doesn't this amount to harrassment and Wikistalking? Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
IMO not if the images are nominated in good faith, check out this history of NoSoftwarePatents talk page for example, me and another editor nominated around 200 of his images for deletion in one go, all save one were deleted in the end. As long as it's in good faith there is no problem. I just want to remove all the images he has simply taken from random internet sites and labelled as his own, without ever attributing the source, always just PD-Self. Jackaranga (talk) 16:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is so easily fixed, what definition are you using for good faith? Helping an eager editor to see their error and tagging them correctly would be good faith. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 01:43, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep The concern is whether the image can quality for Fair Use or not. As per WP:NONFREE, "Copyrighted images that reasonably can be replaced by free/libre images are not suitable for Wikipedia." This image, however, cannot 'reasonably' be replaced by a free image. This is because it is not trivial to generate the associated ASCII art. The image is a screenshot of software, and a work of visual art. It is used for critical commentary. Consequently, it should be kept. --AB (talk) 17:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's not about whether or not it's easy to create an alternative, it's whether or not it's possible. For a music album a free alternative is not possible. For a picture of Will Smith a free alternative is possible. For this image it is possible to create a free alternative and hence it doesn't qualify for fair use. /Lokal_Profil16:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The statement I had quoted was followed by my statements stating why the image can be kept. Additionally, I fail to see how the statement you pointed me to specifically prevents the use of the stated image. At this time this stands as 1 for delete vs 2 for keep. I request that you get arbitration from a WP Administrator. --AB (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
