Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 December 21

< December 20	December 22 >

December 21

Adrian 93 epac.jpg and Beatriz 93 nearlandfall.jpg and Greg 93 peak.jpg and Jova 93.jpg and Kenneth 93 peak.jpg and Lidia 93 peak.jpg and Img-1993-09-21-21-GOE-7-IR edited.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC) Just moved to commons. --क्षेम्य Tranquility 21:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Yanjmaa1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus default keep Discussion ended 6 days ago. Recommend not IFDing this until it is orphaned. Consider discussing the merits of using an image of debatable origin on the articles that use it and possibly removing it from those articles. If it does become an orphan, then an IFD might go uncontested. The fact that this is a public domain image helped. Non-admin closure. --davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yanjmaa1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Onetwo1 (notify | contribs).

I would like to see some evidence that this image really shows Sükhbaataryn Yanjmaa as claimed (and not from a movie still or whatever). The given source is notoriously unreliable. In the past, they included an image of a womain in a 19th century costume with the entry for Sorghaghtani Beki (13th century). There must be images of Yanjmaa available that are of better quality and with known original source and publication circumstances. --Latebird (talk) 00:36, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.radiofeminista.net/mayo07/notas/images/presid2.jpg this is here in her 40-50s. That picture is from the 1920 when Sukhbaatar was still around. The hat is much older hat. You can see the similarity of her faces. That is a very old picture, movies were not made back then. 71.237.70.49 (talk) 05:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no similarity recognisable in those two images, other than that they are both Mongolian (actually, the second one looks more native american to me, but that doesn't mean much). It is not good enough to just say "this is her". We need a reference (in both cases!) to a reliable publication, ie. the book that file was scanned from. She was a public figure, so that can't be so hard, can it? --Latebird (talk) 12:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok here is the reference, http://www.guide2womenleaders.com/womeninpower/Womeninpower1940.htm, you can search "Yanjmaa" in there. Mongolia is not a developed country, so there aren't many photographs like Europe did, so reference and photo of any historical Mongol leader (early 1900s+) are very few and very low quality as you can see from these photos. This is definitely her. You can see the prominent cheekbones on both photos. The younger one has her cheekbone kind of concealed by that tassle hanging from both sides. The age difference is huge probably 30 years difference. First one is around early 20, second one probably around 50-60 year range. 71.237.70.49 (talk) 14:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I have explicitly mentioned in my rationale, that is NOT a reliable source (and neither are the other "female leaders in history" sites that all copied text and images from each other). There must be photographs of her in books or other pulications (this one was also scanned from somewhere, right?), so there is no excuse to use an unsourced one. --Latebird (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this could be solved by finding a reliable source that shows the same picture of Yanjmaa as this womeninpower site. I.e. we don't need a different picture, we only need an additional source. Maybe something like Mongolian websites or picture books. Yaan (talk) 15:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Searching online was the first thing I did before submitting this here, and all I've found (on Google in Mongolian and English and with Tineye) were instances of those two, appaently all copied from each other (same or smaller resolution). Obviously, a sourced image from a book would be very welcome, no matter if it is the same (hopefully in better quality) or a different one. --Latebird (talk) 13:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Slidell High School - Class of 82 .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slidell High School - Class of 82 .jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marjak (notify | contribs).

orphaned personal image, no encyc. use foreseen Skier Dude (talk) 05:32, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Slide14.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slide14.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Asalinas0480 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, uploader absent, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Slide13.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slide13.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Asalinas0480 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, uploader absent, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Slide Bowl Water bong diagram.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slide Bowl Water bong diagram.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spydercanopus (notify | contribs).

orphaned, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Slick1-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slick1-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mark Tewson (notify | contribs).

orphaned, blurred image, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Slick Top 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slick Top 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Unl9074 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sleuth screen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleuth screen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bennydtown (notify | contribs).

orphaned, absent uploader, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Slerbee members.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slerbee members.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Slerbee (notify | contribs).

orphaned, absent uploader, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sleg03.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleg03.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gen Stephen (notify | contribs).

orphaned, absent uploader, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sleet.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleet.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).

orphaned, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sleet shower (night).gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleet shower (night).gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).

orphaned, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sleet shower (day).gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleet shower (day).gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).

orphaned, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sleepygirlgorilla.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleepygirlgorilla.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Merrick79 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, absent uploader, encyc. use/target article unclear (much better images on commons) Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

SleepyDinx.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:SleepyDinx.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hiddink (notify | contribs).

orphaned, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sleepingrocky.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleepingrocky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Justkillingtime (notify | contribs).

orphaned, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sleeping Georgie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I8 by TimVickers (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleeping Georgie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TimVickers (notify | contribs).

orphaned, encyc. use/target article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, cute as he was, I agree that there is no immediate use for this on Wiki. I've copied the file to Commons and deleted the local copy as a duplicate of Image:Sleeping kitten.jpg. 20:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Slawit2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slawit2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by J55pph (notify | contribs).

orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Real!.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Real!.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BevisForTheWin (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and Unencyclopedic, Crudely drawn image solely used for vandalism spree. Michael Devore (talk) 06:01, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Preschoolgrad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Preschoolgrad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aeneik2 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, photograph of anonymous child with no asserted or apparent notability. Appears to have been used in a now-deleted vanity article. Michael Devore (talk) 06:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wird.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wird.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WillDudko (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and Unencyclopedic, digitally-altered commercial image solely used for past vandalism. Michael Devore (talk) 06:11, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, copyright violation too. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:32, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wir.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wir.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WillDudko (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and Unencyclopedic, digitally-altered commercial image solely used for past vandalism. Michael Devore (talk) 06:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Craaaaazoy96.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Craaaaazoy96.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dillon callaway (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and Unencyclopedic, snapshot of person with no asserted or apparent notability. Michael Devore (talk) 06:18, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Eb2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eb2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ebruns9 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and Unencyclopedic, snapshot of people with no asserted or apparent notability. Michael Devore (talk) 06:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Warthog 485085.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Warthog 485085.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Liquid werewolf (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, possible attack page. Uploader copyright claim is dubious (picture is an early hit in Google image search), but status is unconfirmed. Based on uploader talk page and image comment it appears to have been uploaded solely to denigrate someone and, as such, may be eligible for G10 speedy deletion. Michael Devore (talk) 06:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Vostok1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Keep, effectively withdrawn. Also, the February 17, 2008 review can't be ignored. Non-admin closure. --davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vostok1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rlandmann (notify | contribs).

Non-free use violation. No explanation given for why image substantially improves reader understanding in Vostok 1 (WP:NFCC#8). Image is only used by a timeline, is never referred to in the article, ~~and no caption is provided~~. Papa November (talk) 13:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caption in the article was removed by nominator and simply described the image, "Yuri Gargarin in Vostok 1". It seems that the historical context would be clear, and the lack of other similar pictures of the event, especially during the event, that this inclusion is warranted. The article is posted during the timeline which contains quotes from Yuri Gargarin's transmissions to the control station. --Born2flie (talk) 15:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, Twinkle removed the caption with my previous nsd nomination. I've crossed that part of my nomination out and I'll restore the missing caption in the article. Sorry about that!

However, fair use rationales must still explain why an image is essential in an article. Papa November (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The primary element of the Vostok 1 article is that this flight was the first time a human went into space. This photo is of that human, while he was in space. The image shows his attire (a spacesuit) and some of the cockpit in which he was encapsulated. With due respect to those who have concerns in this regard, the NFCC#8 "significance" of the image to the topic does not need any explanation; it is self-evident. The image documents the most important aspect of the event. (sdsds - talk) 02:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 does not require that the image be "essential", merely that "its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". The terms "significantly" and "detrimental" are relative and subjective. I believe that placing the actual flight of Vostok 1 in a visual context satisfies the first part of WP:NFCC#8 and removing it would satisfy the second part. I also note that a review of the image on 17 February 2008 deemed it likely to meed all the criteria of WP:NFCC. Seth ze (talk) 00:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:sdsds, you have raised some useful points and they could be used to build a good fair use rationale. It must explain why this specific image is needed in that specific article. It's not good enough to just say "fair use in Vostok 1" and then copy/paste some generic text... at the moment, the rationale doesn't say anything different from the boilerplate copyright tag! There's no point arguing here that the image should be kept unless some attempt at a specific rationale has been made on the image description page. Papa November (talk) 01:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The rationale is lacking in detail. Have added the following (although I appear to have logged out in the meantime): "The use of the image significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic by portraying conditions inside the Vostok capsule and how the flight was presented to the public at the time. It also places the flight in its historical and technological context. Omission of the image would be detrimental to this understanding." Seth ze (talk) 03:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some explanation of why the image is irreplaceable and moved it to a more prominent location in the article. I think that should be enough to keep the image now. Papa November (talk) 10:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Juliuscaesar.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juliuscaesar.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrwojo (notify | contribs).

Invalid license tag: PD-ART only applies to faithful photographic reproductions of 2D artwork, but this is a photo of a statue and therefore qualifies for its own copyright.

Author of photo and date are not specified, and the source link is dead. Papa November (talk) 13:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't actually upload it, I just wrote the original description. I looked it up in the Internet Archive and found the original source. It was duplicated by commons:File:Gaius_Julius_Caesar_(100-44_BC).JPG, so it's redundant now regardless. --Mrwojo (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Heather-mills-500x703.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heather-mills-500x703.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Captainclegg (notify | contribs).

The photo is mentioned, but merely saying that two people were photographed together does not justify the inclusion of that photo. This image shows nothing significant that merely mentioning the image's existence does not. Furthermore, it has high commercial value. J Milburn (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The commercial value you mention is subsumed by the fact that it was published in the paper and is widely available on the web. If you read the newspaper article you will see that this image is indeed their rationale for proof of the relationship, which was upheld by the PCC. To delete would be to deny the possibility for readers to make up their own mind. To mention the existence of a photograph, but not show it, is to deny the basis of a good and crucially accurate encyclopaedia, which we are all striving to create. I would strongly request that it is left intact. Captainclegg (talk) 14:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Captainclegg. These are both 'public' persona and famous in their own right. To have them linked like this and for it to be accurately sourced through a major newspaper is exactly what a good encyclopaedia is meant to be about. The commercial value argument surely does not work here as the photo has already been published (I too saw the article) and is widely available. And anyway, isn't our job as editors to show as much proof of a statement as possible? Wiki had a lousy reputation for accuracy. Don't lets hamstring ourselves by arguing that we shouldn't show proof when it is already in the public domain. Leave it in I say. Crowley666 (talk) 14:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it them? Yes. Is the story genuine? Apparently. Is it sourced? Yes. Does it back up the article? Yes. Has the image alraedy been seen worldwide? Yes (I saw it here in the US). Whats the problem? None. Leave it alone. Careinthecommunity (talk) 14:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The statement can be sourced quite easily to the article (and already has been). Using the image as a source would require interpretation, which is original research. I don't follow your argument to allow readers to "make up their own mind". We mention the existence of many works, but don't show them- we're a free content encyclopedia- imagine if we were to show the full text of every novel we have an article on, or include an image of every painting in a long list of copyrighted works. Wikipedia is not about showing proof, at all- it is the job of secondary sources to show proof, we just report what they have said. In response to Careinthecommunity, the problem is that the image is non-free, and the article would be fine without it. Yes, it's them, yes, the article mentions them, but do we really need a fair use image of every meeting that Mills has had in her life? Do we really need to "borrow" pictures from every tabloid journalist's scoop? J Milburn (talk) 00:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would say "Yes", why not? and according to other sources, I gather that it is considerably more than a "meeting that Mills has had". Its out there. It exists. Someone else ( a journo) has done the leg-work (excuse the pun!) It is not libellous or otherwise untrue. It is doing no harm and I would rather that proof was shown, than not. What's wrong with it being there? I think that there are other things more important to concern ourselves with. Let It Be and enjoy Christmas. I gather you lot are having a really bad time over there. Good luck. Careinthecommunity (talk) 00:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I am interested in the story and like the fact that the photo, that J Milburn has some objection to, which is in the public domain anyway, is there to be viewed. I have never read of a Wiki user/editor complaining about TO MUCH info before! Crowley666 (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Inclusion of the image does not satisfy NFCC#8 - the image is not required for reader's understanding (the reference proves they were seen together) and certainly does not significantly increase it. - Peripitus (Talk) 09:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

LPaper.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:LPaper.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mfowler11 (notify | contribs).

Weak rationale, used in article that doesn't stand a chance against deletion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DentalWork.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:DentalWork.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mfowler11 (notify | contribs).

Weak rationale, used in article that doesn't stand a chance against deletion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BLaw.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:BLaw.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mfowler11 (notify | contribs).

Weak rationale, used in article that doesn't stand a chance against deletion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:00, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

LHere.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:LHere.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mfowler11 (notify | contribs).

Weak rationale, used in article that doesn't stand a chance against deletion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:01, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PTraining.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:PTraining.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mfowler11 (notify | contribs).

Weak rationale, used in article that doesn't stand a chance against deletion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Piusxiib.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piusxiib.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jtdirl (notify | contribs).

Plenty of freely licensed images of the same subject available. The Pope Pius XII article doesn't make any special mention of this photo, and it's unclear how the reader's understanding of the subject is helped by seeing this one extra photo in an article with 20+ others. Papa November (talk) 23:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ed White spacewalk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ed White spacewalk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ericd (notify | contribs).

Hiding higher-res, colour balanced version of same image at Commons. Papa November (talk) 23:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Jp2synogogue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jp2synogogue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jtdirl (notify | contribs).

Disputed source: Image source quoted as an anti-pope website. Exceedingly unlikely that the site owns copyright to such an image. Other images hosted on the same site such as this one this one have been shown to be copyvios. Papa November (talk) 23:32, 21 December 2008 (UTC) Papa November (talk) 23:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.