Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 February 25
Appearance
February 25
[edit]- According to the source of this image, http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/2719, "[These] photographs of the Swedish ministers on this page may be used free of charge for press and media, not for commercial use, during their term of office." Well, "not for commercial use, during their term of office" is not good enough for Wikipedia. Currently this image is tagged as if it is in the public domain: it is not. Furthermore, because this man is a living government worker, I'm sure someone could easily snap a photograph to license under a free license, so it doesn't qualify as fair use either. Thus, I'm nominating it for deletion bar any objections. Iamunknown 00:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- According to the source of this image, http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/2719, "[These] photographs of the Swedish ministers on this page may be used free of charge for press and media, not for commercial use, during their term of office." Well, "not for commercial use, during their term of office" is not good enough for Wikipedia. Currently this image is tagged as if it is in the public domain: it is not. Furthermore, because this man is a living government worker, I'm sure someone could easily snap a photograph to license under a free license, so it doesn't qualify as fair use either. Thus, I'm nominating it for deletion bar any objections. Iamunknown 00:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned, replaced in article by Image:Indifference-curves-perfect-substitutes.svg User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned, absent uploader User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned, absent uploader User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned chemical representation User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned chemical structure diagram User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned chemical structure diagram User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- delete, we have a better structure in Tabun. Wandalstouring 11:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned, claim of "permission of photographer given" but photographer not given nor details of permission User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Arpingstone (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, used with permission, does not include third party use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, redundant GIF version of Image:Mississippi counties map.png. —Bkell (talk) 01:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, claim of "owner of shot emailed full permission to me" but owner info not provided nor email proof User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Escapeartistalwaysdie (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 01:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, tagged as public domain, but site listed states, "© The Daily Gazette, Swarthmore College, 500 College Avenue, Swarthmore, PA 19081" . Also, as a press photo it fails any fair use claim as well. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Samrackley (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, source link does not work, other images uploaded by user were mis-tagged as PD User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oliverhenriquez (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, no source provided, other images uploaded by user were mis-tagged as PD User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kowloonese (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- I uploaded this photo as a place holder in the Hope diamond article when there was no other free photo to use. I knew the quality was very bad because I took it without using a tripod and no flash was allowed in the museum. If there is already a higher quality image, this one should be deleted. I wonder why the person who took it off the article didn't mark it for deletion sooner. It must have been an orphan for quite some time. Poor thing! Kowloonese 23:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Worldtraveller (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
The image is currently being used on my user page, so it is not actually orphaned. Please abstain from deletion; I feel my userpage is minimal enough without one of its significant images being deleted.Thanks Bumm13 06:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)- Never mind, it's an older version of that image; feel free to delete it Bumm13 06:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, unencyclopedi personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Realist101 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned, absent uploader, edits are vandalism, given the car would not yet exist, likely copyright violation User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- LittleSnapper (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 02:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nickbilton (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Worthawholebean (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality Nv8200p talk 02:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I have no recollection of uploading this. Someone else must have done it on my computer while I was logged in. worthawholebean talkcontribs 00:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Worthawholebean (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Shephardfamilyenterprise (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Lego dude88 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 04:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Chicken1997 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No encyclopedic use, personal pictures, and inproper titles. — esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 04:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Chicken1997 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No encyclopedic use, personal pictures, and inproper titles. — esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 04:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, used on speedily deleted spam page. RJASE1 Talk 04:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, used on speedily deleted spam page. RJASE1 Talk 04:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned. RJASE1 Talk 04:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 04:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- AntoinePancakes (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 04:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Richard090 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 04:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 04:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 04:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- OlympiaDiego (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 04:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 04:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 04:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 05:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, unencyclopedic. —Bkell (talk) 08:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- I support the deletion of this image. Stack 05:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kaspertron (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphanded, low quality. Was added to Biscuit to ilustrate a "biscuit beeing eaten", but was promptly "vote out" and has been orphanded ever since.- Sherool (talk) 10:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kaspertron (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphanded, photo of some random person intended to ilustrate Boredom.- Sherool (talk) 10:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kaspertron (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphanded, not ensyclopedic, low quality.- Sherool (talk) 10:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, used only on speedily deleted page. RJASE1 Talk 14:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, low quality.- User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 15:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, was tagged as no source and uploader removed notice and also licensing tag. It claims to be PD-USGov, but it is extensively watermarked with copyright notice User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 16:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, uploader claims there is no information about the source, creator or copyright. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 16:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, low quality, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 16:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Obsolete - image is really huge (700kb), I have already uploaded jpg version of this image which looks same but it's just 100Kb in size. — --Miko3k 20:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- EdwinCasadoBaez (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, very large (1.7meg), no license tag applied, lower quality image User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please Do not delete because I'M Thinking of making a Image gallery of landmarks of The City of Santo Domingo, where this picture is taking place. User:EdwinCasadoBaez - copied from image talk page by User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned, low quality, no source or license provided User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Cilly Pepper (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, uploader claims magazine cover is copyrighted free use but provides no documentation to support User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- SERSeanCrane (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation of the image by the Topps/Bowman company - Not under fair use as user claims, baseball cards only fall on legitimate fair use if the article is on the card itself, however the article is not about the card in any sense. 24.184.177.78 22:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- SERSeanCrane (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Low quality, Photo looks like a shadow taken from a number of yards away with a low quailty camera — 24.184.177.78 22:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC).
- Keep: It's a free image that illustrates Adam Bostick and is used in the article. If it's of poor quality, that's an opportunity to create a higher-quality photograph. —Bkell (talk) 22:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Bkell. SERSeanCrane 17:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete. No evidence on http://blogs.nydailynews.com/mets/ that "Adam Rubin allows the image to be freely redistributed, modified, used commercially and for any other purpose, provided that their authorship is attributed." Will recommend keep if such evidence is provided. --Iamunknown 20:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Deleting this for quality reasons is a complete joke, however it appears to be an un-free image. Perhaps Sean Crane can contact Rubin via email and receive explicit permission to use it or point to a page on the nydailynews website that actually shows the licensing he claims. Quadzilla99 21:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment In the interest of full-disclosure the nominator is a suspected sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user who repeatedly harassed Sean Crane, and whose edit history shows a pattern of repeatedly inserting copy-vio images. Not that any of that matters in terms of having an improper license on the pic, just thought I'd add the info. Quadzilla99 21:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Obviously if the image is not free, my !vote is reversed. —Bkell (talk) 01:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- CrypticBacon (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Non-free image, claimed fair use in New Rome, Ohio to show the approximate boundaries of the community of New Rome. This image is easily replaceable by a free image that shows the same information. For example, a public-domain aerial photo created by the U.S. federal government could be modified, or someone could draw a street map from scratch. Hence this image fails the first criterion of the fair-use policy. —Bkell (talk) 22:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Correctly tagged by Bkell as replaceable, but User:Proto removed the tag without a correct rational. The source of the image is also dubious. Who took the original image? Where was it sourced? A public domain image should be used instead. Fair use should not be used to justify theft and laziness. --Bob 01:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Image could easily be created with a U.S. federal government image, per Bkell, with NASA WorldWind, etc. --Iamunknown 20:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)