Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 February 19

< February 18	February 20 >

February 19

Image:TepyClown-sm.jpg

Image:TepyClown-sm.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by TomPangborn (notify | contribs).

Low quality, Unencyclopedic, uploaded by drive-by user who only made an edit to user page and uploaded this pic Hbdragon88 01:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not MySpace. His user page is also nominated for deletion. Harryboyles 09:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MemMSNimage.jpg

Image:MemMSNimage.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Quetzalcoatl69 (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB, LQ. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 02:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:idon'tknow.jpg

Image:Idon'tknow.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Quetzalcoatl69 (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 02:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Face.jpg

Image:Face.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Quetzalcoatl69 (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB, LQ. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 02:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Project Mayhem Yaotl.jpg

Image:Project Mayhem Yaotl.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Quetzalcoatl69 (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 02:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2meo1vl.jpg

Image:2meo1vl.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Guesty (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 02:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Broken-SapnaChand.jpg

Image:Broken-SapnaChand.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Blaq canary (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 02:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Now on user's page -Nv8200p talk 02:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chipsets.png

Image:Chipsets.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Polluks (notify | contribs).

Image:Chipsets.png obsoleted by Image:Chipsets2.png — – Fʀɪɺøʟɛ _{( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs )} 05:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons image showing through -Nv8200p talk 02:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vik.jpg

Image:Vik.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Vsp (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB, LQ. Used on now-deleted page. — Calton | Talk 07:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Image:New King George School.jpg

Image:New King George School.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Thivierr (notify | contribs).

OR. Low quality photo, taken by me, has been replaced by higher quality pic in Commons.- Rob 08:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Press conference in vilnius 09.jpg

Image:Press conference in vilnius 09.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Dr keep it simple (notify | contribs).

There are two licences, one is free use, another - fairuse, the same image has been deleted
This image was deleted earlier. Threre are no evidence that image is free.--Qwarc 14:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ActsMUDwintinnet.png

Image:ActsMUDwintinnet.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Zeth (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, Orphaned by afd Iamunknown 09:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Swan city logo.gif

Image:Swan city logo.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Orderinchaos78 (notify | contribs).

Much better logo (Image:Cos logo.jpg) uploaded by the people at City of Swan themselves - my homemade one is now redundant. — Orderinchaos78 13:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bluein.jpg

Unencyclopedic and poor quality — Cascadia^TALK^|^HISTORY 13:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very good image, I like it, the best quality I have. - Patricknoddy 16:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems to be on Commons, not here. If you want it deleted, the discussion should take place on Commons. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I just don't see the purpose of a "colored in" version of a [Image:US-IN-Fort_Wayne.jpg PD image] from Commons.--Isotope23 18:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close, nothing to delete. Now can someone go list these (there's apparently one for each state, though most are png instead of jpg) on commons deletion requests? --Random832(tc) 20:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Why should we request deletion from Commons? It's not needed here on Wikipedia, and while I personally can't think who would want them, there doesn't seem to be any reason to delete a freely-licensed image from Commons thereby prohibiting re-use. Commons has different policies and standards than Wikipedia. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 22:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I deleted the version of this image per WP:CSD I8, as it is already on the commons. This action does not apply to the image on the commons, of course. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 21:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Proposed_new_Germany_flag.gif

Image:Proposed_new_Germany_flag.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Patricknoddy (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, poor quality, possibly insulting to the german people. — Cascadia^TALK^|^HISTORY 14:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Maybe the Germans wouldn't think it is insulting, maybe they would like it. - Patricknoddy 16:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no encyclopedic purpose and I'm going to guess that at least some Germans would find this pimped out flag insulting.--Isotope23 18:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is not an article on Wikipedia that could benefit from this image. Borderline CSD G10, but the user is a good guy that I believe is acting in good faith. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 21:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No place for it on Wikipedia. -Nick^talk 22:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unencyclopedic. -- RM 18:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gramsci.gif

Image:Gramsci.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Gramscis cousin (notify | contribs).

Clearly a derivative work of this photo from the early 1920s, which once was available here and then moved to the commons as Image:Antonio Gramsci.jpg, where it was deleted in October 2006 with the reason "No evidence that the photographer died more than 70 years ago". Indeed I have not been able to find out who took that photo, not even the International Gramsci Society seems to know. If we presume that the original photo was still copyrighted, then so would this derivative work be. If we consider the photo an anonymous work, the photo would most likely indeed be copyrighted (copyrighted in Italy in 1996, thus copyright restored by the URAA in the U.S. The U.S. term is the shorter of 95 years since publication or 120 years since creation.) And if we could actually determine that the photo was indeed PD, then we should use the photo and not this derivative work. Lupo 15:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes this work is based on the photo mentioned but it is an original work by me and is in a long tradition of similar work. I believe it to be sufficiently different to and includes a significant quantity of original work by me to be considered an original work. Note on the history of the image I made this image 2 or 3 years before posting it to Wikipedia and have used it in a number of different contexts in that period. --Gramscis cousin 09:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it is not an original work, it is legally a derivative work. If no free image can be found to illustrate the articles in this image, then the original image from [1] could be considered appropriate under fair use. --Iamunknown 21:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tell that to Andy Warhol I've never heard such paranoid BS. My work (which I note has now been deleted) is an original work of art in the same tradition of Andy Warhol's Marilyn or Campbell soup pictures and Francis Bacon's Screaming Pope. Indeed the history of Art is littered with just such derivative works and I doubt whether they were worried by a this kind of legalese interpretation of (US?) law. - Gramscis cousin 08:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shaak Ti Force Unleashed.jpg

Image:Shaak Ti Force Unleashed.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Poetic Decay (notify | contribs).

CV — Patricknoddy 16:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't get it. What's wrong with the picture, and what does "CV" mean? // DecaimientoPoético 16:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - CV is an acronym for "copyright violation" --Iamunknown 18:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Oh, I guess that makes sense... Anyway, this is my first time uploading concept art. Is there a problem with the copyright tag or where I got the image from? Is concept art not allowed to by uploaded to begin with? // DecaimientoPoético 20:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - Released concept art probably counts as promotional. A fair use rationale would be required. --Random832(t c) 20:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Close and remove tag from the image; it has been appropriately tagged. --Iamunknown 21:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Av-173.jpg

Image:Av-173.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Add uk 2k (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic. Only used in speedily deleted page. RJASE1 ^Talk 19:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopaedic, orphan Iamunknown 23:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think the tag mention it all.This was orphaned after somebody removed it from it's page.User talk:Yousaf465
If the friend could agree to license it according to a free license it could be moved to Commons. It's a quite funny picture. // Liftarn
- Commons does not accept images used without permission under fair use. See Commons:Project scope. --Iamunknown 21:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:River_Emms.jpeg

Image:River_Emms.jpeg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Dlinington (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic?, might not by GFDL-self MECU≈talk 23:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IAH.jpg

Image:IAH.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Daniel2986 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, might be useful in IAH, but it doesn't really show much MECU≈talk 23:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Navalacademychapel.JPG

Image:Navalacademychapel.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Joebengo (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, can barely see the chapel MECU≈talk 00:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michigan_croquet_logo.jpg

Image:Michigan_croquet_logo.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Cmw4117 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, non notable student group with logo, fair use orphaned MECU≈talk 00:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kidcorruption.jpg

Image:Kidcorruption.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by HBP (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, few contribs MECU≈talk 00:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jrad.jpg

Image:Jrad.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by HBP (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, few contribs MECU≈talk 00:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Carlton_S._Coon_Racial_Definitions4.jpg

Image:Carlton_S._Coon_Racial_Definitions4.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Quis_custodiet_ipsos? (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Absent uploader, Low quality MECU≈talk 00:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]