Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 December 11
Appearance
December 11
[edit]- Edguardo11 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unlicensed, unencyclopedic personal photo from a speedied article. Master of Puppets Care to share? 01:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic B (talk) 04:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- replaced with vectorized Image:SensorSizes.svg and a rasterized PNG version of the same (because MediaWiki can't render flowed text in SVGs yet)
ǝɹʎℲxoɯ (contrib) 05:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Phillychzstk (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic name, uploader's only contribution, adds no value over other pictures of erect penises we already have, uncertain licensing as the quote "The penis belongs to pornstar William Longwood and was photographed by Hunter Phillips on December 3, 2007." fails to state what permission uploader has from the photographer. -Nard 07:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I find the image quite interesting and very applicable. It should stay. Hunter Phillips releases most of his work as public domain, so therefore a lisence is not require. Wikipedia does not censor and therefore this photo should not be removed due to some people's prude tendencies and hang ups. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.253.167.211 (talk) 11:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic? Isn't wood slang for the penis anyway? ViperSnake151 12:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, it's not used, and we really are blessed with gobs of high-quality images of penises already. If "blessed" is the right word. – Quadell (talk) (random) 22:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- "Hunter Phillips releases most of his work as public domain" doesn't sound very logical and I'd say there's a high degree of probability this is a copyright violation. --B (talk) 18:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- no copyright info ; orphan —G716 <T·C> 09:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Paddy More (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- As seen at http://www.shanemacgowan.net/gallery41.html William Avery (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - The two images don't resemble one another in the slightest apart from their similarities as Meteor Awards which one would expect. --Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 23:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: correct URL is http://www.shanemacgowan.net/gallery42.html Not sure what's the specific deletion rationale here. Copyvio? It appears to be copyvio, in which case I would say delete. Kelvinc (talk) 06:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correct URL. Yes, it seems to be a copyvio, or at least to require an explanation of how the uploader comes to be the copyright holder of this work. William Avery (talk) 18:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: correct URL is http://www.shanemacgowan.net/gallery42.html Not sure what's the specific deletion rationale here. Copyvio? It appears to be copyvio, in which case I would say delete. Kelvinc (talk) 06:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Supertom777 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- A user wrote a profile of himself (he probably thinks Wikipedia is almost like Bebo or facebook-a profile site) and I have no doubt this image would have been placed there. Cf38 (talk) 20:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Nqtraderman (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Low quality ˉˉanetode╦╩ 23:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)