Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 April 14
April 14
[edit]
- Scan of a baseball card. Tagged as GFDL in good faith, however, as a derivative of a copyrighted work, it can only be used under a claim of fair use. The image is not used in any articles. BigDT 23:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, I do not think this image is useful MECU≈talk 00:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, I do not think this image is useful MECU≈talk 00:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Dhwani1989 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic MECU≈talk 00:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, the source url given is no longer valid, this image can be replaced by another existing free one MECU≈talk 00:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic?, source URL redirects to another website that has a (c) notice on it MECU≈talk 00:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic MECU≈talk 00:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, redundant to Commons image Image:HerbDolega.svg, albeit in different file format.- —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-14 01:17Z
- Image showing on Commons.--Wizardman 01:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, lower quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by TransylvanianKarl (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, recently absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- tagged as {{db-author}} based on uploader's comment on my talk page [1].--User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by PantydeLeopard (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by PantydeLeopard (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by PantydeLeopard (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by PantydeLeopard (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by PantydeLeopard (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by PantydeLeopard (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by PantydeLeopard (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Unused, obsoleted by Image:MetlinkSignBase 313.gif- —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-14 01:50Z
- orphaned image, absent uploader, is a headshot of the uploader User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Random articles (notify | contribs).
- unencyclopedic - map is innaccurate. Luton's population is 184,900, Dunstable's is 33,805 and Houghton Regis' is 17,000, so the urban area cannot be that size! Also compare the two images:
image:LutonDunstable Urban Area map.jpg-Image:EnglandLuton.png
- Both Dunstable and Houghton Regis are to the west of Luton, as may be seen here,so the area to the southeast in the IfD should not be coloured red! — L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 03:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by YAYsocialism (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, tagged as PD-self, but description says "image comes from citizens in East Grand Rapids", which is somewhat obscure BigDT 04:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- An image of an important statue might be a good thing for the encyclopedia to have but this image seems to not have good sourcing... not even a link to the facebook page where it purportedly came from. Since a PD or free image would be easy to obtain, this image should be deleted in accordance with our Fair Use policy. (Note that a daylight image of the same statue already exists: Image:Gaslight Village.JPG so the encyclopedia is not completely lacking an image of this statue) Also, the image name seems to have been chosen for shock value. A more useful image name that used the official statue name seems much more appropriate. The image itself was formerly used in a section of the East Grand Rapids article that is derogatory and unsourced: [2] which was added by a user with few or no other contributions: YAYSocialism (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log) so I really see no reason to keep this, I personally would have speedied it as an attack image. All that adds up to Strong Delete to me. ++Lar: t/c 12:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 05:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 05:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 05:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 06:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
The result was Keep; image not an orphan. --kingboyk 16:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 06:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Exists under Cumulative voting. Tom Ruen 21:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned BigDT 06:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Obsolete Image:Isaac P. Christiancy - Brady-Handy.jpg BigDT 06:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, lower quality for encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, lacks detail for encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, non-notable subject User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, lower quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely incorrectly licensed User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely incorrectly licensed User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, 1 or 2 contributions, unencyclopedic, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, 1 or 2 contributions, unencyclopedic, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ultramagnetic (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, sole contribution of user, I think this is an actor (but don't know who) and it is likely incorrectly licensed User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Geoffman44 (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Pcalexander (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Grimsta2003 (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, sole contribtuion of user, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo, licensed with gfdl-presumed tag User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, tagged as PD-self but text uploaded with image stated fair use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Based on the pixel artifacts, this appears to be grabbed from here and rotated. See also the table at the bottom of this page. Gimmetrow 16:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, tagged as PD-self but text with upload states fair use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, tagged as Pd-self but text included with upload states fair use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Aricooperdavis (notify | contribs).
- orphaned document, sole contribution of user, advertisement, conflicting license tag and uploaded text User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, recently absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It is a beautiful photo and it will be used for sure. Photo needed. Necessary in the project. --Hipcio 08:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC) — Hipcio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete basically exactly per nom. --Iamunknown 01:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, grainy quality, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Restrictive licence: Uploader (copyright owner) prohibits use on the Polish Wikipedia. — kingboyk 13:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please note: every "keep" to date was from single purpose accounts blocked as suspected sockpuppets of User:Annrex. --kingboyk 10:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- I am interested to have this photo here released under this very licence to which I have all the rights granted as the author of the photo, the copyright holder and the uploader. Three reasons in one.. Wow. :) Thank you. --Annrex 14:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Annrex, all content on Wikipedia uses the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it. Following this message, all images restricting their use for others became strictly disallowed. Michaelas10Respect my authoritah
- Delete WP:POINT, WP:TROLLish upload. User is banned from Polish Wikipedia for similar reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Part Deux (talk • contribs) 15:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
The voice with no signature is not valid and should be treated as such. You may uncross it if you provide the proper signature.--Covas 20:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC - fixed --User:Gay Cdn (talk) 22:05, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep (as it is - with no licence change). The photo is still free and released under the proper licence. The author's will (intention) to prohibit the Polish Wikipedia to use this image should be accepted and respected. The reason why he/she decided for such a restriction does not concern me. Obviously it may be a personal reason but I accept it. The reasoning that it is the WP:POINT, WP.TROLLISH upload is irrational. It is a typical subjective i.e. the POV argument. P.S. See the comment I have placed above. --Covas 20:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC) — Covas (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep - the arguments by Covas are sane. --Aldante 21:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - currently this image is an orphan and that is one reason to not keep it around, but more importantly here is a quote from the currently applied license, "...provided that {{{The Polish Wikipedia project is prohibited to use this file and its derivatives}}}." That restriction is perfectly fine, if he/she was hosting it on a website that the user hosted. Unfortunatly, here at WP, in order to be a "free" image, as stated on the applied tag, "derivative work and commercial use must be allowed." --User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- 1. ..and derivative work and commercial use IS allowed for all projects but the Polish one. Isn't that clear?? --Covas 04:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- 2. .. and the photo is no longer orphaned. --Covas 04:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as per Aldante and Covas. --Vinci21 04:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC) — Vinci21 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep - The rights of authors are strongly limited at the Wikimedia projects and the policies of the Wikimedia projects are to deprive authors' rights in every way but this piratical creation mustn't prohibit the author of this photo release it under this very licence and this very Polish limitation.. --Bastet1 11:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC) — Bastet1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep - the picture with this annotation will shake the Empire foundations - anyway, it should be kept unchanged - the delete voices are nothing than the Wikipedia self-defense mechanism.. - I am sure all the Wikimedia projects will not live long and I wish it that way. This is my POV - all proper rights granted. "Cheers". --Draes17 12:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC) — Draes17 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep - The reasons provided above --213.199.192.60 17:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless the licensed is changed to permit unrestricted commercial reuse and derivative works. This is kind of a no-brainer, and I will be appalled and quickly at DRV (well, first at the admin's talk page) if it is closed as a keep just because of these votes. --Iamunknown 17:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- To someone unknown: ..and quickly at DRV (well, first at the admin's talk page) and then, at the loo.. :) --Draes17 21:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. The photo is nice and the licence is also appropriate. --Brudasek 08:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC) — Brudasek (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep. I agree with the preceding keep voters. --Pipcio 08:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC) — Pipcio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep. I agree. --Hipcio 08:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC) — Hipcio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep. Annrex, you've got my support. too. Great photo and the idea. Good luck! --RollanT 08:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC) — RollanT (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep. Annrex is right and has got all the rights to release the photo in such a manner (if she decided to do it). Anyway, I would never place my photos in such a toilet place like this (while in her shoes, of course). --FartWik 10:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC) — FartWik (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep. It is a good photo and properly released. --Kokosz 10:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)— Kokosz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep. Nothing to add. Everything was said. --Rademenes 18:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)— Rademenes (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep. See above. --Brahmaputra1 07:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)— Brahmaputra1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete. Such a license qualifies as non-free. Either everyone gets to use it or it gets deleted. Pretty much as simple as that. Despite the valiant attempts at "keep" votes here, policy trumps consensus every time. howcheng {chat} 00:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Toaster1234 (notify | contribs).
- Only used in Al Bell, a speedily deleted article. - Mike Rosoft 14:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep a nice photo. --Draes17 12:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC) — Draes17 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete, unencyclopedic, orphaned. --Iamunknown 01:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Arpingstone (notify | contribs).
- (Not an orphan) By permission only image uploaded before May 2005 - there are already several free images of this airplane in the article, so this one is not needed BigDT 15:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Wow! --Hipcio 08:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC) — Hipcio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete, unencyclopedic, orphaned. --Iamunknown 01:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- (Not an orphan) News media photos. Under WP:FAIR#Counterexamples #5, news media photos are not valid for fair use BigDT 15:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by QuidMestXveritas (notify | contribs).
- (Not an orphan) Tagged as PD-self, but the uploader guesses about when it might have been taken. That makes the PD-self claim questionable and thus the image does not have a verifiable source. BigDT 15:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Not knowing the precise year does not make the source unverifiable. I've taken film photos in the 2000s and have to guess at the year. Yet I'm quite certain I was the one who took them. Perhaps we can forgive this photographer for forgetting details of dates of events that took place 45 or so years ago, and trust him or her to be the real photographer. Fg2 10:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC) Yet the opening of the Second Vatican Council is not an occasion one would easily forget.
- Image kept. We'll assume good faith on this one. -Nv8200p talk 14:00, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 16:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned cohesion 17:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- (Not an orphan) Image tagged as used with permission, but uploaded before May 2005. It depicts an Ibizan Hound - there are already free images in the article and more free images should be easy to come by BigDT 17:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Gmarine3000 (notify | contribs).
- (Not an orphan) Non-free photo of an IMBEL MD2 gun. It should be easy to find a free replacement. BigDT 17:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- (Not an orphan) Photo used with permission (uploaded prior to May 2005). It should be possible to create or obtain a freely licensed image of this living person. BigDT 17:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Possible Copyright violation. No indication work has been released under the GFDL. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation. No indication image has been released under the GFDL. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation. No indication image has been released under the GFDL. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation. Orphaned. No indication image has been released under the GFDL. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation. Orphaned. No indication image has been released under the GFDL. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Possible Copyright violation. Image licensing summary doesn't match licensing tag, unlikely GFDL license, and "numerous museums" usually don't release stuff into the public domain - they normally claim copyright on everything, whether they have the right to or not. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation. No indication image has been released under the GFDL. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation. No indication image has been released under the GFDL. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ahadland1234 (notify | contribs).
- Obsolete by Commons image Image:Zmachine.jpg. — Rebelguys2 talk 17:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Betsywarrior (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned and low-quality. Basically, a picture of the subject from which the background has been removed, and therefore not a useable image. — Peter G Werner 18:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by The_great_grape_ape_is_straight_out_of_the_know (notify | contribs).
- unnecessary unfree screenshot showing a politician. Abu badali (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 20:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, unsure of an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 20:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic value, possible copyvio Iamunknown 20:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Congressional district images in GIF format
[edit]- - uploaded by Bkonrad (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Chflitwick (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Chflitwick (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Dhwani1989 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Dhwani1989 (notify | contribs).
PNG versions of these images made them obsolete. —Remember the dot (talk) 20:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Lucas.glib (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 20:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Marc pasquin (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, no encyclopedic context Nv8200p talk 20:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Zombie walk Pittsburgh 29 Oct 2006.png made this image obsolete. —Remember the dot (talk) 20:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Moebiusuibeom (notify | contribs).
- Released under a non-commercial creative commons license. Not allowable on Wikipedia. Nv8200p talk 21:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by M1ss1ontomars2k4 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned because Image:Isodesmosine.png made this image obsolete. —Remember the dot (talk) 21:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Low quality Nv8200p talk 21:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree quality is bad (author)--Paco ✉ 07:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Image on commons showing.--Wizardman 01:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Cachaca Dave (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, Not sure of encyclopedic value Nv8200p talk 21:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Has a free license and shows many different brands of Cachaca. Perhaps it should be moved to commons? —dgiestc 18:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Maybe Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 21:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- The uploader name suggests they may have permission, but it's not very good quality so not worth tracking down. —dgiestc 18:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by The Mystery Man (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned because Image:Millard Fillmore White House portrait.png made this image obsolete. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Diplodocusbones (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought Coredesat 22:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought Coredesat 22:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought Coredesat 22:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought Coredesat 22:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete! Delete all of them. →Cyclone1→ 18:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- Smaller, blurrier version of Peter von Cornelius Hagen versenkt den Nibelungenhort 1859.jpg.- grendel|khan 23:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
..jpg){kind=link}
- - uploaded by Diplodocusbones (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, while PD, it does not really have an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Tahiracreole (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, questionable gfdl license given source provided User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- - uploaded by Mikeeilbacher (notify | contribs).
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- - uploaded by Mikeeilbacher (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chriscool334 (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, recently absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Thechopmusic (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by JohnJohnJohnJohn (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, very low quality, unsure of an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Skinzfan23 (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, recently absent uploader, insufficent information to determine usage User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Limesterjuden (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic graphic, incorrectly licensed based on uploader's text User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Lesserredpanda (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, questionable PD-self license User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Lesserredpanda (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
