Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 November 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 20

[edit]

image is copyrighted and has recently been the result of several edit wars on the article page for Fantasia Barrino. 200.167.230.39 19:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, probable copyvio. The uploader (who has no other contribs) asserts he created this picture, but it appears to be an album cover instead. (Radiant) 11:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by ONUnicorn (notify | contribs). LQ OR LQ UE LQ. Did I mention LQ?- Chris talk back 01:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
1. I uploaded it to commons some time ago; hence it is speediable because it is a duplicate of an image on Commons. (Personal attack removed)(Restoring the essence of removed comment.) 2. It would have been polite for you to inform me (the uploader) that you woud be nominating this for deletion. If you had I would have informed you that it had been moved to Commons and was speediable under that criteria. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 15:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oi. There's no need for that tone. Chris talk back 15:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, the nominator did not mention which article this was removed from. It was removed from the article Fork in the road. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 15:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(After edit conflict) What tone? What personal attack? You have been extremely rude about this from the very beginning. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 15:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, what's with the attitude? Chris talk back 15:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What attitude? ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 15:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Did I mention LQ" might be a bit offputting. ++Lar: t/c 16:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Did you really have to put LQ four times? I mean, come on, its not that funny. One time is enough. --Weatherman1126 (talk) 17:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Scotty.n (notify | contribs). Fails FUC #1. The Wii is out now, it could easily be replaced with a free image. Hbdragon88 01:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Ohmangel (notify | contribs). ORcholmes75 (chit chat) 04:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Missbcworld2006 (notify | contribs). Conflicting licensing claims. Peter O. (Talk) 07:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by ChrisMHMChris (notify | contribs). Orphaned, no sources, failed first fair use criterion, and no fair use rationale. —Roguegeek (talk) 12:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Folajimi (notify | contribs). This is an orphaned image. I tagged it with orphaned fair use, but was disputed by the uploader. There is still a missing tag that will need to be applied to claim the fair use. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 12:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep. The nominator will have to explain how he came up with the assertion that the image in question is an orphan. This image is being used by The Montgolfier Brothers.

:Could someone please stop this nonsense? There is more than enough work to be done than to have to deal with busybodies who are tagging items for deletion with reckless abandon... --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 12:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by YorkyRufus (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, unencyclopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 12:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by YorkyRufus (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 12:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by YorkyRufus (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 12:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by YorkyRufus (notify | contribs). orphaned image, absent uploader, unencylopedic personal photo Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 12:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure I see how this is a personal photo. It is from a court case that appears, perhaps, to be setting some sort of precedent in the field of fostering or juvenile abuse. It's not clear to my why so much of the court transcript has been placed in the image description, nor is it clear to me what article this image is for, but if there were such an article and if the image description were cleaned up, it's a keep, to my way of thinking. not NOW, it needs work or it should be deleted, but it could be. The original uploader should fix it and soon or it SHOULD be deleted. But the characterisation may not be completly correct. ++Lar: t/c 16:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by YorkyRufus (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, unencylopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 12:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Benfilardi (notify | contribs). OR, AB, watermarked (violates WP:IUP). Fritz S. (Talk) 13:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Klauskrauss (notify | contribs). Image is copyrighted and used under fairuse, fair use criteria requires that a free image could not be created to replace it while its a very fine sunset the buildings are accessible to the public as indicated by other images in the article—Gnangarra 15:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). ORcholmes75 (chit chat) 15:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Blackjays (notify | contribs). Copyright image from greatertoronto.org.—Mindmatrix 15:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Golgialvarez (notify | contribs). OR.—cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by JackSparrow (notify | contribs). Orphaned—Lijnema 20:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rifleman_82 (notify | contribs). Self IFD in favor of commons image- Rifleman 82 23:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This one is on commons already - speedied. --HappyCamper 00:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]