Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 May 28

May 28

The following images have been linked to the article Max Ernst and improperly tagged as public domain.

Justin Foote 00:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Userbox red y.png
Derivative work and trademark infringment of the yahoo logo, despite being made from scratch. ed g2s • talk 01:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination and above FunkyChicken! 21:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete the people who wrote in this thread I agree with! Nertz 19:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Doodie.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Farzonl (notify). OR, possible CV —PS2pcGAMER (talk) 02:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination FunkyChicken! 21:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:yv9.jpg and Image:vj9.jpg

where to start... clearly spurious claim of "i made it myself" (copyright watermarking is clear on both pics). And the only reason these two hard porn photos were uploaded was so as they could be added to a (twice speedied and now protected) attack page. Can't see any way they quite qualify under speedy criteria, but hopefully someone will spot how they can. Grutness...wha? 04:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well all of the copyright rules in WP:CSD, not to mention vandalism. Speedy deleted. ed g2s • talk 11:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chase field 1.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by SportsFan411 (notify). CV. Free alternate can be taken. —fuzzy510 06:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. There is no valid reason for deletion. There is no current free alternative and fair use is acceptable in that case for use in demonstrating an article. So unless you're going to upload a "free" image of the Talledega raceway there is no basis for this deletion. Gateman1997 18:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the lack of a free alternative right now means that one must be created, not that a non-free image should be used in its place. --fuzzy510 18:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True, one should be created. But this should be kept until one is to illustrate the image. Gateman1997 19:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime though, it's still a copyright violation. I agree that there should be an image there, but we still need to operate within the Fair Use rules. --fuzzy510 01:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And at the current time we are. That is unless you're willing to fly to Arizona, buy a ticket, and take a picture of this stadium? Gateman1997 07:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The stadium is there - someone can take a picture of it, like one of the many Wikipedians who live in Arizona. --fuzzy510 21:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is this fair use? No rationale. No source. No copyright holder stated. Tagged as promotional but looks like it comes from news coverage. This a long way short of what counts as fair use. TheGrappler 16:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination FunkyChicken! 21:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Scottsdale Stadium.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by FPAtl (notify). CV. Free alternative can be taken. —fuzzy510 06:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. There is no valid reason for deletion. There is no current free alternative and fair use is acceptable in that case for use in demonstrating an article. So unless you're going to upload a "free" image of the Talledega raceway there is no basis for this deletion. Gateman1997 18:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the lack of a free alternative right now means that one must be created, not that a non-free image should be used in its place. --fuzzy510 18:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True, one should be created. But this should be kept until one is to illustrate the image. Gateman1997 19:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime though, it's still a copyright violation. I agree that there should be an image there, but we still need to operate within the Fair Use rules. --fuzzy510 01:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And at the current time we are. That is unless you're willing to fly to Arizona, buy a ticket, and take a picture of this stadium? Gateman1997 07:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The stadium is there - someone can take a picture of it, like one of the many Wikipedians who live in Arizona. --fuzzy510 21:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination and others. Someone there can shot a shot of it! FunkyChicken! 21:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tai O San Ki Bridge.jpg, CV--Shizhao 12:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If the copyright owner is willing to give Wikipedia the right to use his photo (for Wikipedia). --Computor 15:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have asked the creator of this picture to update its license.--Computor 11:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Invalid nom. The upload date pre-dates the fair-use ban and the license was with permission for Wikipedia explicitly anyways. I updated the license, but there was nothing wrong with that license when it was uploaded. It was uploaded and licensed before the "fair use ban". It's the "permission" part of that license that was all that mattered. SchmuckyTheCat 15:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - Since this was created by a Wikipedian, I'll keep this image for now. Instead, I've tagged image with {{fair use replace}}. howch e ng {chat} 18:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nertz 19:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Valleduparflag.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by F3rn4nd0 (notify). OB by SVG version Commons:Image:Valleduparflag.svg —MeekMark 13:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Normans cleave.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by SELlbydate (notify). Orphan (OR) --Marknew 15:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination FunkyChicken! 21:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Valledupar cesar.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by F3rn4nd0 (notify). OB by png version Commons:Image:Valledupar_cesar.png —MeekMark 15:20, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wallace In Battle.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Nukles (notify). OR —cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image-calcutta victoria palace 03.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Harishmukundan (notify). OR —cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:19, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ds2f(2).png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by AppleJuicefromConcentrate (notify). CV, Apple symbol is used in logo, does not qualify for fair use-- The ikiroid 17:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Image:Ds2f(1).png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by AppleJuicefromConcentrate (notify). Same as above. - Mike Rosoft 18:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Talledaga.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Gateman1997 (notify). CV. Free alternative can be taken. Was listed once, Uploader removed from list. —fuzzy510 18:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. I removed it because there is no valid reason for deletion. There is no current free alternative and fair use is acceptable in that case for use in demonstrating an article. So unless you're going to upload a "free" image of the Talledega raceway there is no basis for this deletion. Gateman1997 18:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the lack of a free alternative right now means that one must be created, not that a non-free image should be used in its place. --fuzzy510 18:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True, one should be created. But this should be kept until one is to illustrate the image. Gateman1997 19:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - At the very least, the image page needs a better listing of the source. Just referencing nascar.com isn't good enough, as that's a HUGE page. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime though, it's still a copyright violation. I agree that there should be an image there, but we still need to operate within the Fair Use rules. --fuzzy510 01:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a copyvio at this time and is in full compliance with fair use. Gateman1997 04:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sf dhalsim pose 1.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Nbgoku (notify). OB: Replaced with Sf dhalsim pose 1.png —Jorge Peixoto 19:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Harrisjayaraj.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by M.arunprasad (notify). CV. Tagged as a poster, but it does not appear to be one. Looks more like a copyrighted photo. No source listed. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kurumin-Linux-Snapshot.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Sanmartin (notify). I downloaded it from Wikipedia, optimized with optipng (17% decrease), clarified the copyright status, and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. —Jorge Peixoto 21:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NewHampshireIntlSpeedway.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Gateman1997 (notify). CV. Free alternative can be taken. —fuzzy510 23:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete, Restating my objections from above. No free alternative is available at this time. And using it is acceptable within fair use if you'd read it. Gateman1997 06:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FUC #1: "No free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information." --fuzzy510 08:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you have a helocopter and are going to fly over NHIS tomorrow, no free alternative can be created at this time. Gateman1997 07:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The speedway is there - someone can take a picture of it, like one of the many Wikipedians who live in New Hampshire. --fuzzy510 21:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]