Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Victoria Cross/archive2

Featured topic

13 articles

Another merge proposal. It appears artificial to have two separate topics on the same subject. Nergaal (talk) 04:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This seems reasonable enough, although I would like to hear the opinions of some contributors. Ucucha 06:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the Wikipedia:Featured topics/Victoria Cross topic is about four different awards with the same name. While the Wikipedia:Featured topics/Lists of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign covers awards of the British medal by campaign. Jim Sweeney (talk) 04:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jim Sweeney -MBK₀₀₄ 05:24, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My thanks to Jim for letting me know about this. My position hasn't changed since the nomination for the campaign recipients. My arguments there still hold I think. Woody (talk) 11:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jim and Woody. Although related, they are distinct and seperate branches of the topic. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 04:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—the current structure, with two separate topics, works much better. While the topics are named similarly, they are distinct, separate topics. –Grondemar 01:23, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - for this to be properly merged, you'd need to write FLs for the Australians, Canadians, and New Zealanders who won the VC. Otherwise you have a big gap. Parsecboy (talk) 12:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. List of Australian Victoria Cross recipients and List of Canadian Victoria Cross recipients are FLs, the New Zealanders one was previously demoted as FL (by me) as the definitions of nationality for Commonwealth forces is so fluid. (see FLRC. Woody (talk) 16:50, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Close with no consensus to promote. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]