Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Lists of men's major championships winning golfers

Lists of men's major championships winning golfers

Men's major championships winning golfers, Lists of

Featured topic

5 articles

Masters Tournament champions

U.S. Open champions

The Open Championship champions

PGA Championship champions

I feel this topic should become a featured list, as it meets all the featured topic criteria, all the articles included in the topic are of featured quality. All the lists are factually accurate up to date and are fully referenced. Thanks in advance for your comments. NapHit (talk) 20:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - can you unify the "See also" sections? rst20xx (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
could you explain what you mean by unify? NapHit (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well if you go through and look at the sections, they're a bit of a mess, some linking to some of the other majors, some linking (via redirect) back to the main article and others having no links at all. I don't mind if these sections are deleted entirely (cos the template's below) or if it's made so that all articles link to all other in the "See also" sections, but at the moment it's all a bit inconsistent... rst20xx (talk) 23:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for clearing that up, I've removed see also sections from every list. NapHit (talk) 23:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also (unrelated) could you replace {{topicnom}} with {{featured topic box}} in your nomination? Noms are meant to use the latter now, not the former, simply as it saves work for the promoting admin, and means the nominator gets the image they want for sure - rst20xx (talk) 23:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done as well NapHit (talk) 23:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Seems to fit the criteria. Z gin der 2008-11-23T20:51Z (UTC)
Comment Topic should probably be renamed to Lists of men's major championships winning golfers, with the added "s". Gary King (talk) 22:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done NapHit (talk) 22:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - thank you for jumping through my nitpicky hoops - rst20xx (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I see no problem with these articles, well done! Grovermj 02:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]