Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Lists of North Carolina hurricanes/addition1
Appearance
Lists of North Carolina hurricanes (1st supplementary nomination)
[edit]This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Lists of North Carolina hurricanes for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
It's a little late, but the new list is now featured, thanks to Juliancolton. Thus, it should be added to the existing topic. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support. The "..., lists of" looks a little awkward, can't think of how to better it though. - The Bushranger (talk) 16:36, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- ...was just about to nom this myself. Support addition with the aforementioned bias. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:36, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support - simple. After this there will be no broken retentions for at least another 3 weeks! - rst20xx (talk) 18:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support - better late than never -MBK004 22:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support with the name of "North Carolina hurricanes". —Goodtimber (walk/talk) 01:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- The problem with that name is that this topic doesn't contain any of the hurricanes, just the lists of them. If a topic was built around List of North Carolina hurricanes (1900–1949) (for example) that did contain all the hurricanes, then I expect that that topic would just be called "North Carolina hurricanes (1900–1949)". But this one isn't so it's not - rst20xx (talk) 23:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Just a note, the Florida hurricanes one is the same as this. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- The problem with that name is that this topic doesn't contain any of the hurricanes, just the lists of them. If a topic was built around List of North Carolina hurricanes (1900–1949) (for example) that did contain all the hurricanes, then I expect that that topic would just be called "North Carolina hurricanes (1900–1949)". But this one isn't so it's not - rst20xx (talk) 23:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 22:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)