Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/March 2011
- Contributor(s): Stone, Mav, me, Cryptic C62, WP Elements
Not enough chemistry topics! --Nergaal (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support I agree! Covers everything. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support Amazing work! — Novice7 (talk) 14:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support, with an asterisk. The section on Unpentquadium is unsourced in the main article. I'd be all the happier if you could get that sourced. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed. That is a better catch than you might have guessed (since although the statement was based on common inorganic chemistry, actual theoretical research predicts something else). Nergaal (talk) 02:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support. This, along with my last edit to the main article page, makes this topic flawless. I have no opposition to the nomination. FREYWA 13:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support igordebraga ≠ 20:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support - amazing! -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 14:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment, BTW Hafnium has some deadlinks. See book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Resurrected the dead links. --Stone (talk) 20:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Closed with consensus to promote. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Contributor(s): Hurricanehink
All of the articles are GA. This topic is along the lines of 1950, 1951, and 1952, which have been up here in the past few weeks. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support as it seems complete. I think {{Infobox Hurricane Small}} should also contain a fatalities entry. Nergaal (talk) 04:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment, but I think such an addition would make the Infobox too long. It's meant to be a small infobox, after all ;) --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support, looks complete. Juliancolton (talk) 23:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment, BTW, at least Tropical Storm Alice has some dead links. See book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Should be good now. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support - kind of confused why this is still sitting around, it's been here for over a month. Everything looks good here. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- I got swamped by handling the GA drive and neglected my duties here. Will promote in a bit. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Closed with consensus to promote. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Slayer studio albums
[edit]With the help of M3tal H3ad and LuciferMorgan, all the studio albums released by the thrash metal band Slayer are now either featured or good articles. I'm hoping to eventually expand this topic to Slayer albums (one article away), Slayer discography, and hopefully, the main Slayer article can be a good topic. CrowzRSA 00:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support appears complete, and since there is consensus to have studio albums topics this looks ok. Nergaal (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Are any of the GAs being planned for an FA run? If so, we can let that go through FAC and if it passes it could be promoted as an FT rather than a GT. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- I think World Painted Blood is the only article close to FA right now. But maybe in the future… CrowzRSA 20:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- If you are planning on nominating it soon, this could remain open. An alternative would be to have a bot running Wikipedia:Featured topics promoted in 2011 for good topics, and whenever auto-promotions occur, the bot would copy the information from the GT log one to FT. Nergaal (talk) 03:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not gonna nominate it 'til it gets another peer review, and I copyedit it a bunch. By the time it's nominated, I'll probably be able to expand this topic to Slayer albums. CrowzRSA 03:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- If you are planning on nominating it soon, this could remain open. An alternative would be to have a bot running Wikipedia:Featured topics promoted in 2011 for good topics, and whenever auto-promotions occur, the bot would copy the information from the GT log one to FT. Nergaal (talk) 03:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support I just wonder about moving Diabolus in Musica to the second column, but no biggie. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support, very nice. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:55, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Live Intrusion is suggested to be merged at Slayer discography. Shouldn't that be resolved first? Also, there are a few deadlinks in God Hates Us All, see book report for details.Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Consensus is to promote as Headbomb's comment appears to have been addressed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- How has it been addressed? No one talked about it here and the merge templates are still there in the articles? And there are still dead links.Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- If Live Intrusion was listed as part of the topic then there'd be an issue outstanding. But neither of what you mention are relevant to the topic per se.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:26, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- How has it been addressed? No one talked about it here and the merge templates are still there in the articles? And there are still dead links.Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 06:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Consensus is to promote as Headbomb's comment appears to have been addressed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Scharnhorst class armored cruisers
[edit]Germany's last traditional class of armored cruisers (before the hybrid SMS Blücher), these two ships gained widespread notoriety during WWI as the core of Spee's East Asia Squadron, which destroyed Cradock's squadron at the Battle of Coronel and were in turn destroyed themselves by Sturdee's battlecruisers at the Battle of the Falkland Islands. User:Parsecboy 14:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support Great job, all articles look great. CrowzRSA 15:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support Maybe we need an Operation Salty Greyhound to work on cruiser articles! ;) - The Bushranger One ping only 18:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Whhat about Sturm's destroyers then? Parsecboy (talk) 20:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Those are obviously part of Operation Tin Can!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Whhat about Sturm's destroyers then? Parsecboy (talk) 20:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support appears complete. Nergaal (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support Nice work. Thurgate (talk) 18:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Consensus to promote.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)