Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/March 2010
South Park (season 13)
[edit]- "The Ring"
- "The Coon"
- "Margaritaville"
- "Eat, Pray, Queef"
- "Fishsticks"
- "Whale Whores"
- "The F Word"
- "Dances with Smurfs"
- "Pee"
This is a good topic nomination. I've been working on this for some time in conjunction with the South Park Featured Topic Drive, and since all the articles are now GA status, I believe it's ready for GT. Nergaal and other WikiProject South Park users have helped out along the way. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 04:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - you've not formatted the book correctly; I suggest you copy Book:South Park (season 1) more closely. Also, as per the Season 1 FTC, you need to put {{South Park episodes}} everywhere - rst20xx (talk) 14:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think I've fixed the book, but please let me know if I didn't. And sorry I completely forgot about {{South Park episodes}}, but they are now added. — Hunter Kahn 14:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support - rst20xx (talk) 22:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think I've fixed the book, but please let me know if I didn't. And sorry I completely forgot about {{South Park episodes}}, but they are now added. — Hunter Kahn 14:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support: All criteria met. Great work. The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 19:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Why is Dances with Smurfs out of order in the box? Zginder 2010-03-19T21:17Z (UTC)
- Hell ya —Terrence and Phillip 08:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Great work. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Well done. Pyrrhus16 19:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Close with consensus to promote - keep 'em coming! rst20xx (talk) 16:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
German Type UB I submarines
[edit]- Main contribuitor: Bellhalla
He has suddenly stopped editing two months ago and I have left a notification on his talkpage about a month ago. This might be one of the last contributions that Bellhalla has given to Wikipedia. Nergaal (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: I believe the subtopic should be separated because it has 5+1 article by itself and because I plan on nominating a super-topic on Austro-Hungarian classes or submarine list which would need the U-10 class as a subtopic by itself. Nergaal (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Oppose- I disagree as I do not think the topics are big enough to merit splitting. I definitely think that SM U-10 (Austria-Hungary) (the only one of the 5 not a GA but at GAN) and SM U-11 (Austria-Hungary), in particular, should be part of this topic, as they were originally used by the German navy, and were only later sold to Austria-Hungary (while the other three boats in the U-10 class were built for and used from the start by Austria-Hungary). Also I don't think your plans to nominate a supertopic are relevant as the U-10 class article can appear in such a supertopic whether it has its own topic or not. While it would make for nice visual structures, I don't see why this supertopic would need the U-10 class to appear as a subtopic at all. More than that, the subtopic link could actually point back to this topic - rst20xx (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, so you are suggesting to remove the class article and add 10 & 11, then in the supertopic put the class article but link here for the subtopic? Or you want the class and the five other articles here? Nergaal (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- I think the second option would be better, and after all, 10 is the only one of the 6 articles that isn't a GA already - rst20xx (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- What should happen to the image in that case, as some of the boats did not run under the German flag. Nergaal (talk) 20:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- As the Germans made all the boats, I don't see a problem with still using this flag, or maybe the German national flag - rst20xx (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. I've gotten SM U-11 to GA status and the GA for SM U-10 was a quick pass. All articles are at GA status now.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- As the Germans made all the boats, I don't see a problem with still using this flag, or maybe the German national flag - rst20xx (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, so you are suggesting to remove the class article and add 10 & 11, then in the supertopic put the class article but link here for the subtopic? Or you want the class and the five other articles here? Nergaal (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - so uh then the Austro-Hungarian boats, all GAs now, are SM U-10 (Austria-Hungary), SM U-11 (Austria-Hungary), SM U-15 (Austria-Hungary), SM U-16 (Austria-Hungary) and SM U-17 (Austria-Hungary). As I understand it, they were all built with the UB Is, and the first two were in fact formerly used by Germany in the UB I class. I think all 5 should be added to this topic, and certainly the first two - rst20xx (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes to all, Nergal promoted SM U-10 and I promoted SM U-11. However credit goes to Bellhalla for the whole thing. But all articles are now at GA.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - so, uh, it seems most people would favour adding the articles (well, 2 out of 3). I've added them above and struck my oppose. I would support the 22-article layout above. Feedback from others would be appreciated - rst20xx (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support,
but should the U-10 class be a subtopic?—Ed (talk • majestic titan) 21:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)- Well, that's what all the discussion before your vote was about... rst20xx (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- ...and I continue to demonstrate my lack of reading skills. ;) Thanks Rst. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 16:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well, that's what all the discussion before your vote was about... rst20xx (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 17:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Saratoga campaign
[edit]This topic is based on the contents of {{Campaignbox American Revolutionary War: Saratoga campaign}}, which are unified by the article on the Saratoga campaign. Magic♪piano 15:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - book please - rst20xx (talk) 16:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- It just took me a bit to figure out how to do it (I didn't find the book tool helpful). Magic♪piano 19:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I would have thought you'd have just copied another book! Anyway I removed the piping out of battle/siege etc above as better to let people see which it was. Also colons not bullet points. Support - rst20xx (talk) 14:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I think these articles have much for info than they did a few months ago. Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 08:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Everything checks out. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- It just took me a bit to figure out how to do it (I didn't find the book tool helpful). Magic♪piano 19:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support -MBK004 20:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Close with consensus to promote - sorry about the delay - rst20xx (talk) 16:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Quietly Confident Quartet
[edit]- Main contribuitor: YellowMonkey
Last time one article was missing. Nergaal (talk) 19:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- No votes (even opposing) in a whole week? Nergaal (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Well I can't vote; I'll give the main race another run-through YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars photo poll) 01:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - everything seems covered -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - this is comprehensive, now the race's article is included. Nice work - rst20xx (talk) 13:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support —Terrence and Phillip 09:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - book please - rst20xx (talk) 16:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- check Nergaal (talk) 20:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- I fixed the formatting, which has to follow strict rules for books - rst20xx (talk) 14:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- check Nergaal (talk) 20:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)